Back to Search
Start Over
Readmission-related outcomes of surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients aged 65 or older with bicuspid aortic valve.
- Source :
-
Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions [Cardiovasc Revasc Med] 2024 Jun; Vol. 63, pp. 16-20. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 15. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: There continues to be debate regarding the superiority of transcatheter (TAVR) over surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV). We aimed to compare outcomes during readmissions in elderly patients with BAV who underwent SAVR or TAVR.<br />Methods: Patients 65 years or older with BAV who underwent TAVR or isolated SAVR were identified using the National Readmission Database from 2012 through 2018. We compared outcomes during readmissions within 90 days after discharge from the index surgery. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust the baseline differences.<br />Results: During the study period, 8555 and 1081 elderly patients with BAV underwent SAVR and TAVR, respectively. The number of patients who underwent TAVR went up by 179 % from 2012 to 2018. Propensity score matching yielded 573 patients in each group. A total of 111 (19.4 %) in the SAVR group and 125 (21.8 %) in the TAVR group were readmitted within 90 days after the index surgery (p = .31). The mortality during the readmissions within 90 days was equivalent between the two groups (0.9 % in the SAVR group vs. 3.2 % in the TAVR group, p = .22). However, the median hospital cost was approximately doubled in the TAVR group during the readmission (18,250 dollars vs. 9310 dollars in the SAVR group, p < .001).<br />Conclusions: Readmission within 90 days was common in both groups. While the mortality during the readmissions after the surgery was equivalent between the two groups, hospital cost was significantly more expensive in the TAVR group.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: IS receives institutional research support from Abbott, Artivion, Atricure, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Terumo Aortic. None related to this manuscript.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Male
Female
Aged
Treatment Outcome
Time Factors
Aged, 80 and over
Risk Factors
United States
Retrospective Studies
Age Factors
Risk Assessment
Postoperative Complications etiology
Aortic Valve Stenosis surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis mortality
Aortic Valve Stenosis physiopathology
Patient Readmission
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement adverse effects
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement mortality
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement economics
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease surgery
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease diagnostic imaging
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease mortality
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease physiopathology
Aortic Valve surgery
Aortic Valve abnormalities
Aortic Valve diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve physiopathology
Databases, Factual
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation mortality
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation economics
Heart Valve Diseases surgery
Heart Valve Diseases mortality
Heart Valve Diseases diagnostic imaging
Heart Valve Diseases physiopathology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1878-0938
- Volume :
- 63
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38233251
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.01.009