Back to Search Start Over

METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS): a quality scoring tool for radiomics research endorsed by EuSoMII.

Authors :
Kocak B
Akinci D'Antonoli T
Mercaldo N
Alberich-Bayarri A
Baessler B
Ambrosini I
Andreychenko AE
Bakas S
Beets-Tan RGH
Bressem K
Buvat I
Cannella R
Cappellini LA
Cavallo AU
Chepelev LL
Chu LCH
Demircioglu A
deSouza NM
Dietzel M
Fanni SC
Fedorov A
Fournier LS
Giannini V
Girometti R
Groot Lipman KBW
Kalarakis G
Kelly BS
Klontzas ME
Koh DM
Kotter E
Lee HY
Maas M
Marti-Bonmati L
Müller H
Obuchowski N
Orlhac F
Papanikolaou N
Petrash E
Pfaehler E
Pinto Dos Santos D
Ponsiglione A
Sabater S
Sardanelli F
Seeböck P
Sijtsema NM
Stanzione A
Traverso A
Ugga L
Vallières M
van Dijk LV
van Griethuysen JJM
van Hamersvelt RW
van Ooijen P
Vernuccio F
Wang A
Williams S
Witowski J
Zhang Z
Zwanenburg A
Cuocolo R
Source :
Insights into imaging [Insights Imaging] 2024 Jan 17; Vol. 15 (1), pp. 8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 17.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: To propose a new quality scoring tool, METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS), to assess and improve research quality of radiomics studies.<br />Methods: We conducted an online modified Delphi study with a group of international experts. It was performed in three consecutive stages: Stage#1, item preparation; Stage#2, panel discussion among EuSoMII Auditing Group members to identify the items to be voted; and Stage#3, four rounds of the modified Delphi exercise by panelists to determine the items eligible for the METRICS and their weights. The consensus threshold was 75%. Based on the median ranks derived from expert panel opinion and their rank-sum based conversion to importance scores, the category and item weights were calculated.<br />Result: In total, 59 panelists from 19 countries participated in selection and ranking of the items and categories. Final METRICS tool included 30 items within 9 categories. According to their weights, the categories were in descending order of importance: study design, imaging data, image processing and feature extraction, metrics and comparison, testing, feature processing, preparation for modeling, segmentation, and open science. A web application and a repository were developed to streamline the calculation of the METRICS score and to collect feedback from the radiomics community.<br />Conclusion: In this work, we developed a scoring tool for assessing the methodological quality of the radiomics research, with a large international panel and a modified Delphi protocol. With its conditional format to cover methodological variations, it provides a well-constructed framework for the key methodological concepts to assess the quality of radiomic research papers.<br />Critical Relevance Statement: A quality assessment tool, METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS), is made available by a large group of international domain experts, with transparent methodology, aiming at evaluating and improving research quality in radiomics and machine learning.<br />Key Points: • A methodological scoring tool, METRICS, was developed for assessing the quality of radiomics research, with a large international expert panel and a modified Delphi protocol. • The proposed scoring tool presents expert opinion-based importance weights of categories and items with a transparent methodology for the first time. • METRICS accounts for varying use cases, from handcrafted radiomics to entirely deep learning-based pipelines. • A web application has been developed to help with the calculation of the METRICS score ( https://metricsscore.github.io/metrics/METRICS.html ) and a repository created to collect feedback from the radiomics community ( https://github.com/metricsscore/metrics ).<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1869-4101
Volume :
15
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Insights into imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38228979
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01572-w