Back to Search Start Over

Utilisation of radiotherapy in lung cancer: A scoping narrative literature review with a focus on the introduction of evidence-based therapeutic approaches in Europe.

Authors :
Corral J
Borras JM
Lievens Y
Source :
Clinical and translational radiation oncology [Clin Transl Radiat Oncol] 2023 Dec 18; Vol. 45, pp. 100717. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 18 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The aim of this study was to review the published studies on the utilisation of radiotherapy in lung cancer (both small and non-small cell lung cancer, SCLC and NSCLC) patients in European countries with a population-based perspective.<br />Material and Methods: A literature search since January 2000 until December 2022 was carried out. Only English-published papers were included, and only European data was considered. PRISMA guidelines were followed. A scoping narrative review was undertaken due to the hetereogeneity of the published papers.<br />Results: 38 papers were included in the analysis, with the majority from the Netherlands (52.6%) and the UK (18.4%). Large variability is observed in the reported radiotherapy utilisation, around 40% for NSCLC in general and between 26 and 42% in stage I NSCLC. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) shows a wide range of utilisation across countries and over time, from 8 to 63%. Similary, in stage III lung cancer, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) utilisation varied considerably (11-70%). Eleven studies compared radiotherapy utilisation between older and younger age-groups, showing that younger patients receive more CRT, while the opposite applies for SBRT. An widespreadlack of data on relevant covariates such as comorbidty and health-services related variables is observed.<br />Conclusion: The actual utilisation of radiotherapy for lung cancer reported in patterns-of-care studies (POCs) is notably lower than the evidence-based optimal utilisation. Important variability is observed by country, time period, stage at diagnosis and age. A wider use of POCs should be promoted to improve our knowledge on the actual application of evidence-based treatment recommendations.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (© 2023 The Authors.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2405-6308
Volume :
45
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical and translational radiation oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38226026
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100717