Back to Search Start Over

Timing of recovery of quality of life after robotic anatomic lung resection.

Authors :
Dyas AR
Colborn KL
Stuart CM
McCabe KO
Barker AR
Sack K
Randhawa SK
Mitchell JD
Meguid RA
Source :
Journal of robotic surgery [J Robot Surg] 2024 Jan 13; Vol. 18 (1), pp. 18. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 13.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an underreported aspect of surgical recovery. The purpose of our study was to track PROs after robotic anatomic lung to determine the timing to recovery of baseline patient baseline quality of life. This was a prospective cohort study at an academic medical center (4/2021-12/2022). Patients who underwent robotic anatomic lung resection were asked to complete PROMIS-29 surveys at the preoperative clinic visit, postoperative clinic visit, 30 days and 90 days postoperatively via in-person and email-based electronic surveys. The PROPr score, a summary of health-related quality of life, and mental and physical health z-scores were estimated for each patient using published methods and compared by postoperative timing. 75 patients completed the preoperative survey and at least one postoperative survey; 56 completed postoperative clinic surveys, 54 completed 30-day postoperative surveys, and 40 completed 90-day postoperative surveys. All three PROMIS scores decreased between the preoperative and first postoperative visit (all p < 0.05). PROPr scores increased over time but remained significantly worse than baseline by 90 days (-0.08 difference between 90 days and preoperative, p = 0.02). While PROMIS summary z-scores for physical health remained - 0.29 lower at 90 days postoperatively, this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06). Mental health scores returned to baseline by 90 days postoperatively (p = 0.41). While some PROs returned to baseline by 90 days postoperatively, overall quality-of-life scores remained significantly below preoperative baselines. These findings are important to share with patients during the informed consent process to achieve patient centered care more effectively.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1863-2491
Volume :
18
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of robotic surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38217734
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01795-5