Back to Search Start Over

Treatment outcomes for ARUBA-eligible brain arteriovenous malformations: a comparison of real-world data from the NVQI-QOD AVM registry with the ARUBA trial.

Authors :
Alrohimi A
Achey RL
Thompson N
Abdalla RN
Patterson T
Moazeni Y
Rasmussen PA
Toth G
Bain MD
Ansari SA
Hussain SM
Moore NZ
Source :
Journal of neurointerventional surgery [J Neurointerv Surg] 2024 Jan 09. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 09.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Background: Significant controversy exists about the management of unruptured cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Results from A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations (ARUBA) suggested that intervention increases the risk of stroke/death compared with medical management. However, numerous study limitations raised concerns about the trial's generalizability.<br />Objective: To assess the rate of stroke/death and functional outcomes in ARUBA-eligible patients from a multicenter database, the Neurovascular Quality Initiative-Quality Outcomes Database (NVQI-QOD).<br />Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of ARUBA-eligible patients who underwent intervention at 18 participating centers. The primary endpoint was stroke/death from any cause. Secondary endpoints included neurologic, systemic, radiographic, and functional outcomes.<br />Results: 173 ARUBA-eligible patients underwent intervention with median follow-up of 269 (25-722.5) days. Seventy-five patients received microsurgery±embolization, 37 received radiosurgery, and 61 received embolization. Baseline demographics, risk factors, and general AVM characteristics were similar between groups. A total of 15 (8.7%) patients experienced stroke/death with no significant difference in primary outcome between treatment modalities. Microsurgery±embolization was more likely to achieve AVM obliteration (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated no difference in overall death/stroke outcomes between the different treatment modalities' 5-year period (P=0.087). Additionally, when compared with the ARUBA interventional arm, our patients were significantly less likely to experience death/stroke (8.7% vs 30.7%; P<0.001) and functional impairment (mRS score ≥2 25.4% vs 46.2%; P<0.01).<br />Conclusion: Our results suggest that intervention for unruptured brain AVMs at comprehensive stroke centers across the United States is safe.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1759-8486
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of neurointerventional surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38195249
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2023-020525