A Review of Commonly used Health-Related Quality of Life instruments in Gynecological Cancer Survivors.

The number of cancer survivors is increasing steadily due to an aging population, continuing improvement in early detection, and treatment. Comparative effectiveness studies and clinical trials are being done to assess late effects of treatment and health-related quality of life. This is in addition to long-term follow-up to assess survival. The aim of the review was to summarize the literature on commonly used quality of life instruments for patients with gynecological cancers with special focus on patient reported outcomes. A literature review was done to summarize the commonly used health-related quality of life instruments in gynecological cancer survivors. Most items assess general quality of life, sexual function, and/or treatment-related toxicity. The commonly reported instruments are the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C30) with disease specific modules for cervix, ovary, and endometrium. Another tool is the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) questionnaire with similar disease specific modules. The questionnaires were accessed with permission from these organizations. These instruments typically have about 10-30 questions that assess treatment related bowel and bladder toxicity. This is connected to the patients' self-reported quality of life, generally ranked using a 5-point scale. Length and emphasis vary in different questionnaires. The validated tools in cancer populations allow better quantification and assessment of quality of life. However, there may be limitations. Some of the general instruments may be too broad to assess treatment-related long-term side effects. Others may be too narrow to generalize closely related patient groups. Also, some questions may not be culturally appropriate in certain situations.
Competing Interests: Conflict of InterestThe authors declare no competing interests.
(© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.)