Back to Search Start Over

Perioperative quality indicators specific to the practice of anesthesia in noncardiac surgery: an umbrella review.

Authors :
Nguyen F
Liao G
McIsaac DI
Lalu MM
Pysyk CL
Hamilton GM
Source :
Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie [Can J Anaesth] 2024 Feb; Vol. 71 (2), pp. 274-291. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 05.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: Improvement in delivery of perioperative care depends on the ability to measure outcomes that can direct meaningful changes in practice. We sought to identify and provide an overview of perioperative quality indicators specific to the practice of anesthesia in noncardiac surgery.<br />Source: We conducted an umbrella review (a systematic review of systematic reviews) according to Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. We included systematic reviews examining perioperative indicators in patients ≥ 18 yr of age undergoing noncardiac surgery. Our primary outcome was any quality indicator specific to anesthesia. Indicators were classified by the Donabedian system and perioperative phase of care. The quality of systematic reviews was assessed using AMSTAR 2 criteria. Level of evidence of quality indicators was stratified by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Classification.<br />Principal Findings: Our search returned 1,475 studies. After removing duplicates and screening of abstracts and full texts, 23 systematic reviews encompassing 3,164 primary studies met our inclusion criteria. There were 330 unique quality indicators. Process indicators were most common (n = 169), followed by outcome (n = 114) and structure indicators (n = 47). Few identified indicators were supported by high-level evidence (45/330, 14%). Level 1 evidence supported indicators of antibiotic prophylaxis (1a), venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (1a), postoperative nausea/vomiting prophylaxis (1b), maintenance of normothermia (1a), and goal-directed fluid therapy (1b).<br />Conclusion: This umbrella review highlights the scarcity of perioperative quality indicators that are supported by high quality evidence. Future development of quality indicators and recommendations for outcome measurement should focus on metrics that are supported by level 1 evidence. Potential targets for evidence-based quality-improvement programs in anesthesia are identified herein.<br />Study Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42020164691); first registered 28 April 2020.<br /> (© 2024. Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1496-8975
Volume :
71
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38182828
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02671-4