Back to Search
Start Over
18 F-FAPI-04 Outperforms 18 F-FDG PET/CT in Clinical Assessments of Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.
- Source :
-
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine [J Nucl Med] 2024 Feb 01; Vol. 65 (2), pp. 206-212. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 01. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Accurate diagnosis and staging are crucial for selecting treatment for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The desmoplastic responses associated with PDAC are often characterized by hypometabolism. Here, we investigated <superscript>18</superscript> F-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-04 PET/CT in evaluation of PDAC and compared the findings with those obtained using <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG. Methods: Sixty-two PDAC patients underwent <superscript>18</superscript> F-FAPI-04 PET/CT and <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG PET/CT. Identification of primary lesions, lymph node (LN) metastasis, and distant metastasis (DM) by these methods was evaluated, and TNM staging was performed. Correlation between SUV <subscript>max</subscript> of the primary lesion and treatment response was explored in patients who received systemic therapy. Results: <superscript>18</superscript> F-FAPI-04 PET/CT identified all patients with PDAC; <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG PET/CT missed 1 patient. Tracer uptake was higher in <superscript>18</superscript> F-FAPI-04 PET/CT than in <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG PET/CT in primary tumors (10.63 vs. 2.87, P < 0.0001), LN metastasis (2.90 vs. 1.43, P < 0.0001), and DM (liver, 6.11 vs. 3.10, P = 0.002; peritoneal, 4.70 vs. 2.08, P = 0.015). The methods showed no significant difference in the T staging category, but the N and M values were significantly higher for <superscript>18</superscript> F-FAPI-04 PET/CT than for <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG PET/CT ( P = 0.002 and 0.008, respectively). Thus, 14 patients were upgraded, and only 1 patient was downgraded, by <superscript>18</superscript> F-FAPI-04 PET/CT compared with <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG PET/CT. A high SUV <subscript>max</subscript> of the primary tumor did not correlate with treatment response for either <superscript>18</superscript> F-FAPI-04 or <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG. Conclusion: <superscript>18</superscript> F-FAPI-04 PET/CT performed better than <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG PET/CT in identification of primary tumors, LN metastasis, and DM and in TNM staging of PDAC.<br /> (© 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1535-5667
- Volume :
- 65
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38176719
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.266283