Back to Search
Start Over
Routine diversion following delayed IPAA construction does not reduce the incidence of pouch-related sepsis or failure in patients with ulcerative colitis.
- Source :
-
Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland [Colorectal Dis] 2024 Feb; Vol. 26 (2), pp. 326-334. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 02. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Aim: The aim of this study was to compare modified 2-stage and 3-stage IPAA construction techniques to evaluate the effect of diverting loop ileostomy following completion proctectomy and IPAA for ulcerative colitis. In addition, our overall institutional experience was reviewed to describe long-term outcomes and changes in staging trends over time.<br />Methods: Our institutional database was searched to identify all cases of IPAA for ulcerative colitis between 1981 and 2018. Patient, pouch and outcome characteristics were abstracted. Primary study outcomes were the incidence of primary pouch failure and pouch-related sepsis. Failure was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival over time. The adjusted effect of pouch stage was evaluated using multivariable Cox and logistic regression models. Exploratory analysis evaluated the effect of stage on failure in the pouch related sepsis subgroup.<br />Results: A total of 2105 patients underwent primary IPAA over the study period. The 5, 10 and 20-year pouch survival probabilities were 95.2%, 92.7% and 86.6%. The incidence of pouch related sepsis was 12.3%. Adjusted analysis demonstrated no difference in pouch failure (HR = 0.64: 95% 0.39-1.07, p = 0.09) or post-operative sepsis (aOR = 0.79: 95% CI 0.53-1.17, p = 0.24) by stage of construction. Among patients experiencing pouch sepsis, there was no difference in Kaplan-Meier estimates of pouch survival by stage (p = 0.90).<br />Conclusions: Pouch related sepsis and IPAA failure did not differ between modified 2-stage and 3-stage construction techniques. Among the sub-group of patients experiencing pouch related sepsis, there was no difference in failure between groups. The results suggest diverting ileostomy may be safely avoided following delayed pouch reconstruction in appropriately selected patients.<br /> (© 2024 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Incidence
Rectum surgery
Postoperative Complications epidemiology
Postoperative Complications etiology
Postoperative Complications prevention & control
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Colitis, Ulcerative surgery
Colitis, Ulcerative complications
Proctocolectomy, Restorative adverse effects
Proctocolectomy, Restorative methods
Sepsis epidemiology
Sepsis etiology
Sepsis prevention & control
Colonic Pouches adverse effects
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1463-1318
- Volume :
- 26
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38169082
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16836