Unveiling the Hungarian landscape of laboratory and clinical management capacities for invasive fungal infections: navigating the frontlines against fungal menaces.

Background: Antifungal diagnostic capacity has been documented in various countries, there is a lack of comprehensive research on clinical mycology diagnostics and treatment in Hungary.
Methods: We conducted an online survey encompassing questions that explored various aspects of the mycology diagnostic and antifungal therapy-related information. The survey aimed to gather details about institutional profiles, perceptions of invasive fungal infections (IFIs), and access to microscopy, culture, serology, antigen detection, molecular testing, and therapeutic drug monitoring.
Results: As of May 2023, a total of 17 institutions responded to the questionnaire. Seven participants categorized the institutional incidence of IFI as 'very low', four as 'low', and six as 'mild'. The majority of centers identified Candida spp. (94%) and Aspergillus spp. (82%) as the most prevalent fungal pathogens. Nearly half of the laboratories (47%) reported using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification. All institutions had access to microscopy and culture-based diagnostic approaches. A significant number of centers had access to antigen detection (71%) and various molecular assays (59%). Regarding antifungal agents, all reporting sites used at least one triazole, with voriconazole (77%) being the most common mold-active azole. Furthermore, 71% of the centers applied at least one formulation of amphotericin B, and 65% to one echinocandin. However, only 18% of the centers used 5-flucytosine.
Conclusion: Resource availability for diagnosing and treating IFI in Hungary varies across hospitals based on location. Surveys help identify gaps and limitations in this area. To address these challenges, interregional cooperation within Hungary could be a facilitating strategy.
Competing Interests: RK has no conflict of interest. LM has received conference travel grants from MSD, Astellas, and Pfizer. JS has received research support from the Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and Basilea Pharmaceuticals Inc., outside the submitted work; has received speaker honoraria from Pfizer Inc., Gilead, and AbbVie, outside the submitted work; has been a consultant to Gilead, Produkt&Markt GmbH, Alvea Vax. and Micron Research, outside the submitted work; and has received travel grants by German Society for Infectious Diseases (DGI e.V.) and Meta-Alexander Foundation, outside the submitted work. OAC reports grants or contracts from Amplyx, Basilea, BMBF, Cidara, DZIF, EU-DG RTD (101037867), F2G, Gilead, Matinas, MedPace, MSD, Mundipharma, Octapharma, Pfizer, Scynexis; Consulting fees from Amplyx, Biocon, Biosys, Cidara, Da Volterra, Gilead, Matinas, MedPace, Menarini, Molecular Partners, MSG-ERC, Noxxon, Octapharma, PSI, Scynexis, Seres; Honoraria for lectures from Abbott, Al-Jazeera Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, Grupo Biotoscana/United Medical/Knight, Hikma, MedScape, MedUpdate, Merck/MSD, Mylan, Pfizer; Payment for expert testimony from Cidara; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Actelion, Allecra, Cidara, Entasis, IQVIA, Janssen, MedPace, Paratek, PSI, Shionogi; a patent at the German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DE 10 2021 113 007.7), outside of the submitted work. JSG reports speaker honoraria from Gilead and Pfizer, outside of the submitted work.
(© The Author(s), 2023.)