Back to Search Start Over

On a roll: a direct comparison of extraction methods for the recovery of eDNA from roller swabbing of surfaces.

Authors :
Guthrie AM
Nevill P
Cooper CE
Bateman PW
van der Heyde M
Source :
BMC research notes [BMC Res Notes] 2023 Dec 18; Vol. 16 (1), pp. 370. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 18.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Objective: Roller swabbing of surfaces is an effective way to obtain environmental DNA, but the current DNA extraction method for these samples is equipment heavy, time consuming, and increases potential contamination through multiple handling. Here, we used rollers to swab a dog kennel and compared three DNA extraction approaches (water filtration, roller trimming and direct buffer) using two different platforms (Qiacube, Kingfisher). DNA extraction methods were evaluated based on cost, effort, DNA concentration and PCR result.<br />Results: The roller trim method emerged as the optimal method with the best PCR results, DNA concentration and cost efficiency, while the buffer-based methods were the least labour intensive but produced mediocre PCR results and DNA concentrations. Additionally, the Kingfisher magnetic bead extractions generally ranked higher in all categories over the Qiacube column-based DNA extractions. Ultimately, the ideal DNA extraction method for a particular study is influenced by logistical constraints in the field such as the size of the roller, the availability of cold storage, and time constraints on the project. Our results demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, allowing for informed decision making by researchers.<br /> (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1756-0500
Volume :
16
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMC research notes
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38111014
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06669-5