Back to Search Start Over

Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.

Authors :
Sonneveld P
Dimopoulos MA
Boccadoro M
Quach H
Ho PJ
Beksac M
Hulin C
Antonioli E
Leleu X
Mangiacavalli S
Perrot A
Cavo M
Belotti A
Broijl A
Gay F
Mina R
Nijhof IS
van de Donk NWCJ
Katodritou E
Schjesvold F
Sureda Balari A
Rosiñol L
Delforge M
Roeloffzen W
Silzle T
Vangsted A
Einsele H
Spencer A
Hajek R
Jurczyszyn A
Lonergan S
Ahmadi T
Liu Y
Wang J
Vieyra D
van Brummelen EMJ
Vanquickelberghe V
Sitthi-Amorn A
de Boer CJ
Carson R
Rodriguez-Otero P
Bladé J
Moreau P
Source :
The New England journal of medicine [N Engl J Med] 2024 Jan 25; Vol. 390 (4), pp. 301-313. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 12.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, has been approved for use with standard myeloma regimens. An evaluation of subcutaneous daratumumab combined with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) for the treatment of transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma is needed.<br />Methods: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 709 transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma to receive either subcutaneous daratumumab combined with VRd induction and consolidation therapy and with lenalidomide maintenance therapy (D-VRd group) or VRd induction and consolidation therapy and lenalidomide maintenance therapy alone (VRd group). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points were a complete response or better and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status.<br />Results: At a median follow-up of 47.5 months, the risk of disease progression or death in the D-VRd group was lower than the risk in the VRd group. The estimated percentage of patients with progression-free survival at 48 months was 84.3% in the D-VRd group and 67.7% in the VRd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.59; P<0.001); the P value crossed the prespecified stopping boundary (P = 0.0126). The percentage of patients with a complete response or better was higher in the D-VRd group than in the VRd group (87.9% vs. 70.1%, P<0.001), as was the percentage of patients with MRD-negative status (75.2% vs. 47.5%, P<0.001). Death occurred in 34 patients in the D-VRd group and 44 patients in the VRd group. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in most patients in both groups; the most common were neutropenia (62.1% with D-VRd and 51.0% with VRd) and thrombocytopenia (29.1% and 17.3%, respectively). Serious adverse events occurred in 57.0% of the patients in the D-VRd group and 49.3% of those in the VRd group.<br />Conclusions: The addition of subcutaneous daratumumab to VRd induction and consolidation therapy and to lenalidomide maintenance therapy conferred a significant benefit with respect to progression-free survival among transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. (Funded by the European Myeloma Network in collaboration with Janssen Research and Development; PERSEUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03710603; EudraCT number, 2018-002992-16.).<br /> (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1533-4406
Volume :
390
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The New England journal of medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38084760
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2312054