Non-pathogenic Neisseria species of the oropharynx as a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance: a cross-sectional study.

Commensal Neisseria species of the oropharynx represent a significant reservoir of antimicrobial resistance determinants that can be transferred to Neisseria gonorrhoeae . This aspect is particularly crucial in 'men having sex with men' (MSM), a key population in which pharyngeal co-colonization by N. gonorrhoeae and non-pathogenic Neisseria species is frequent and associated with the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Here, we explored the antimicrobial susceptibility of a large panel of non-pathogenic Neisseria species isolated from the oropharynx of two populations: a group of MSM attending a 'sexually transmitted infection' clinic in Bologna (Italy) (n=108) and a group of males representing a 'general population' (n=119). We collected 246 strains, mainly belonging to N. subflava (60%) and N. flavescens (28%) species. Their antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated assessing the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone using E-test strips. Overall, commensal Neisseria spp. showed high rates of resistance to azithromycin (90%; median MICs: 4.0 mg/L), and ciprofloxacin (58%; median MICs: 0.12 mg/L), whereas resistance to cephalosporins was far less common (<15%). Neisseria strains from MSM were found to have significantly higher MICs for azithromycin (p=0.0001) and ciprofloxacin (p<0.0001) compared to those from the general population. However, there was no significant difference in cephalosporin MICs between the two groups. The surveillance of the antimicrobial resistance of non-pathogenic Neisseria spp. could be instrumental in predicting the risk of the spread of multi-drug resistant gonorrhea. This information could be an early predictor of an excessive use of antimicrobials, paving the way to innovative screening and prevention policies.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
(Copyright © 2023 Gaspari, Djusse, Morselli, Rapparini, Foschi, Ambretti, Lazzarotto, Piraccini and Marangoni.)