Back to Search Start Over

Prioritizing a research agenda on built environments and physical activity: a twin panel Delphi consensus process with researchers and knowledge users.

Authors :
Prince SA
Lang JJ
de Groh M
Badland H
Barnett A
Littlejohns LB
Brandon NC
Butler GP
Casu G
Cerin E
Colley RC
de Lannoy L
Demchenko I
Ellingwood HN
Evenson KR
Faulkner G
Fridman L
Friedenreich CM
Fuller DL
Fuselli P
Giangregorio LM
Gupta N
Hino AA
Hume C
Isernhagen B
Jalaludin B
Lakerveld J
Larouche R
Lemon SC
Loucaides CA
Maddock JE
McCormack GR
Mehta A
Milton K
Mota J
Ngo VD
Owen N
Oyeyemi AL
Palmeira AL
Rainham DG
Rhodes RE
Ridgers ND
Roosendaal I
Rosenberg DE
Schipperijn J
Slater SJ
Storey KE
Tremblay MS
Tully MA
Vanderloo LM
Veitch J
Vietinghoff C
Whiting S
Winters M
Yang L
Geneau R
Source :
The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity [Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act] 2023 Dec 07; Vol. 20 (1), pp. 144. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 07.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: The growth of urban dwelling populations globally has led to rapid increases of research and policy initiatives addressing associations between the built environment and physical activity (PA). Given this rapid proliferation, it is important to identify priority areas and research questions for moving the field forward. The objective of this study was to identify and compare research priorities on the built environment and PA among researchers and knowledge users (e.g., policy makers, practitioners).<br />Methods: Between September 2022 and April 2023, a three-round, modified Delphi survey was conducted among two independent panels of international researchers (n = 38) and knowledge users (n = 23) to identify similarities and differences in perceived research priorities on the built environment and PA and generate twin 'top 10' lists of the most important research needs.<br />Results: From a broad range of self-identified issues, both panels ranked in common the most pressing research priorities including stronger study designs such as natural experiments, research that examines inequalities and inequities, establishing the cost effectiveness of interventions, safety and injuries related to engagement in active transportation (AT), and considerations for climate change and climate adaptation. Additional priorities identified by researchers included: implementation science, research that incorporates Indigenous perspectives, land-use policies, built environments that support active aging, and participatory research. Additional priorities identified by knowledge users included: built environments and PA among people living with disabilities and a need for national data on trip chaining, multi-modal travel, and non-work or school-related AT.<br />Conclusions: Five common research priorities between the two groups emerged, including (1) to better understand causality, (2) interactions with the natural environment, (3) economic evaluations, (4) social disparities, and (5) preventable AT-related injuries. The findings may help set directions for future research, interdisciplinary and intersectoral collaborations, and funding opportunities.<br /> (© 2023. Crown.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1479-5868
Volume :
20
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38062460
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01533-y