Back to Search Start Over

A randomised phase 2 study of intermittent versus continuous dosing of dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF V600 mutant advanced melanoma (INTERIM).

Authors :
Dayimu A
Gupta A
Matin RN
Nobes J
Board R
Payne M
Rao A
Fusi A
Danson S
Eccles B
Carser J
Brown CO
Steven N
Bhattacharyya M
Brown E
Gonzalez M
Highley M
Pickering L
Kumar S
Waterston A
Burghel G
Demain L
Baker E
Wulff J
Qian W
Twelves S
Middleton M
Corrie P
Source :
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) [Eur J Cancer] 2024 Jan; Vol. 196, pp. 113455. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 24.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: BRAF+MEK inhibitors extend life expectancy of patients with BRAF <superscript>V600</superscript> mutant advanced melanoma. Acquired resistance limits duration of benefit, but preclinical and case studies suggest intermittent dosing could overcome this limitation. INTERIM was a phase 2 trial evaluating an intermittent dosing regimen.<br />Methods: Patients with BRAF <superscript>V600</superscript> mutant advanced melanoma due to start dabrafenib+trametinib were randomised to receive either continuous (CONT), or intermittent (INT; dabrafenib d1-21, trametinib d1-14 every 28 days) dosing. A composite primary endpoint included progression-free survival (PFS) and quality of life (QoL). Secondary endpoints included response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). Mutant BRAF <superscript>V600E</superscript> ctDNA was measured by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), using mutant allele frequency of > 1 % as the detection threshold.<br />Results: 79 patients (39 INT, 40 CONT) were recruited; median age 67 years, 65 % AJCC (7th ed) stage IV M1c, 29 % had brain metastases. With 19 months median follow-up, INT was inferior in all efficacy measures: median PFS 8.5 vs 10.7mo (HR 1.39, 95 %CI 0.79-2.45, p = 0.255); median OS 18.1mo vs not reached (HR 1.69, 95 %CI 0.87-3.28, p = 0.121), ORR 57 % vs 77 %. INT patients experienced fewer treatment-related AEs (76 % vs 88 %), but more grade > 3 AEs (53 % vs 42 %). QoL favoured CONT. Detection of BRAF <superscript>V600E</superscript> ctDNA prior to treatment correlated with worse OS (HR 2.55, 95 %CI 1.25-5.21, p = 0.01) in both arms. A change to undetected during treatment did not significantly predict better OS.<br />Conclusion: INTERIM findings are consistent with other recent clinical trials reporting that intermittent dosing does not improve efficacy of BRAF+MEK inhibitors.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-0852
Volume :
196
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38029480
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113455