Back to Search Start Over

Opening the digital front door for individuals using long-term in-home ventilation (LIVE) during a pandemic- implementation, feasibility and acceptability.

Authors :
Amin R
Qazi AM
Ambreen M
Naushad N
Pizzuti R
Buchanan F
Gershon A
Rose L
Source :
Digital health [Digit Health] 2023 Nov 07; Vol. 9, pp. 20552076231213447. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 07 (Print Publication: 2023).
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to an unprecedented need for virtual healthcare that was safe, acceptable and feasible to deliver. In May 2020, we launched the Long-term In-Home Ventilator Engagement (LIVE) program for ventilator assisted individuals using ventilators hosted on an e-platform in Ontario, Canada.<br />Objectives: To assess the acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility and usability of the LIVE program reported by patients, family caregivers, and healthcare providers (HCP).<br />Design and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study. We provided HCPs participating in the LIVE program anonymized questionnaires (Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), and mHealth App Usability (MAUQ). Patients and family caregivers completed the AIM and MAUQ. Questionnaires were administered via an e-platform.<br />Results: We recruited 105/251 (42%) patients and family caregivers and 42/48 (87.5%) HCPs. Patients and caregivers rated a mean (SD) overall AIM score of 4.3 (0.7) (maximum score 5; higher scores indicate greater acceptability) and a mean (SD) overall MAUQ score of 5.8 (1.5) (maximum score 7; higher scores indicate greater useability). HCPs rated a mean (SD) overall AIM score of 4.3 (0.7), IAM score of 4.3 (0.8), FIM score of 4.2 (0.7) and overall MAUQ score of 5.6 ± 1.5. There were no differences in AIM ((4.3 (0.7) vs 4.3 (0.8), p  = 1) or MAUQ (5.8 (1.5) vs 5.6 (1.5), p  = 0.5) scores between patients/ family caregivers and HCPs.<br />Interpretation: This study suggests that the LIVE program was acceptable, appropriate, feasible, and usable from the perspective of patients, family caregivers and HCPs.<br />Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2023.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2055-2076
Volume :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Digital health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38025099
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231213447