Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota as a susceptibility factor for Kawasaki disease.

Introduction: Gut microbial imbalance (dysbiosis) has been reported in patients with acute Kawasaki disease (KD). However, no studies have analyzed the gut microbiota while focusing on susceptibility to KD. This study aimed to evaluate whether dysbiosis elevates susceptibility to KD by assessing children with a history of KD.
Methods: Fecal DNA was extracted from 26 children with a history of KD approximately 1 year prior (KD group, 12 boys; median age, 32.5 months; median time from onset, 11.5 months) and 57 age-matched healthy controls (HC group, 35 boys; median age, 36.0 months). 16S rRNA gene analysis was conducted with the Illumina Miseq instrument. Sequence reads were analyzed using QIIME2.
Results: For alpha diversity, Faith's phylogenetic diversity was significantly higher in the KD group. Regarding beta diversity, the two groups formed significantly different clusters based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity. Comparing microbial composition at the genus level, the KD and HC groups were significantly different in the abundance of two genera with abundance over 1% after Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction for multiple comparisons. Compared with the HC group, the KD group had higher relative abundance of Ruminococcus gnavus group and lower relative abundance of Blautia .
Discussion and Conclusion: Ruminococcus gnavus group reportedly includes pro-inflammatory bacteria. In contrast, Blautia suppresses inflammation via butyrate production. In the predictive functional analysis, the proportion of gut microbiota involved in several pathways was lower in the KD group. Therefore, dysbiosis characterized by distinct microbial diversity and decreased abundance of Blautia in parallel with increased abundance of Ruminococcus gnavus group might be a susceptibility factor for KD.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
(Copyright © 2023 Teramoto, Akagawa, Hori, Tsuji, Higasa and Kaneko.)