Back to Search Start Over

Effect of Noninvasive Airway Management of Comatose Patients With Acute Poisoning: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors :
Freund Y
Viglino D
Cachanado M
Cassard C
Montassier E
Douay B
Guenezan J
Le Borgne P
Yordanov Y
Severin A
Roussel M
Daniel M
Marteau A
Peschanski N
Teissandier D
Macrez R
Morere J
Chouihed T
Roux D
Adnet F
Bloom B
Chauvin A
Simon T
Source :
JAMA [JAMA] 2023 Dec 19; Vol. 330 (23), pp. 2267-2274.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Importance: Tracheal intubation is recommended for coma patients and those with severe brain injury, but its use in patients with decreased levels of consciousness from acute poisoning is uncertain.<br />Objective: To determine the effect of intubation withholding vs routine practice on clinical outcomes of comatose patients with acute poisoning and a Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 9.<br />Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter, randomized trial conducted in 20 emergency departments and 1 intensive care unit (ICU) that included comatose patients with suspected acute poisoning and a Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 9 in France between May 16, 2021, and April 12, 2023, and followed up until May 12, 2023.<br />Intervention: Patients were randomized to undergo conservative airway strategy of intubation withholding vs routine practice.<br />Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite end point of in-hospital death, length of ICU stay, and length of hospital stay. Key secondary outcomes included adverse events resulting from intubation as well as pneumonia within 48 hours.<br />Results: Among the 225 included patients (mean age, 33 years; 38% female), 116 were in the intervention group and 109 in the control group, with respective proportions of intubations of 16% and 58%. No patients died during the in-hospital stay. There was a significant clinical benefit for the primary end point in the intervention group, with a win ratio of 1.85 (95% CI, 1.33 to 2.58). In the intervention group, there was a lower proportion with any adverse event (6% vs 14.7%; absolute risk difference, 8.6% [95% CI, -16.6% to -0.7%]) compared with the control group, and pneumonia occurred in 8 (6.9%) and 16 (14.7%) patients, respectively (absolute risk difference, -7.8% [95% CI, -15.9% to 0.3%]).<br />Conclusions and Relevance: Among comatose patients with suspected acute poisoning, a conservative strategy of withholding intubation was associated with a greater clinical benefit for the composite end point of in-hospital death, length of ICU stay, and length of hospital stay.<br />Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04653597.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1538-3598
Volume :
330
Issue :
23
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JAMA
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38019968
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.24391