Back to Search Start Over

Survival and neurological outcome after bystander versus lay responder defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A sub-study of the BOX trial.

Authors :
Sarkisian L
Isse YA
Gerke O
Obling LER
Paulin Beske R
Grand J
Schmidt H
Højgaard HF
Meyer MAS
Borregaard B
Hassager C
Kjaergaard J
Møller JE
Source :
Resuscitation [Resuscitation] 2024 Feb; Vol. 195, pp. 110059. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 25.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background and Aim: Bystander defibrillation is associated with increased survival with good neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Dispatch of lay responders could increase defibrillation rates, however, survival with good neurological outcome in these remain unknown. The aim was to compare long-term survival with good neurological outcome in bystander versus lay responder defibrillated OHCAs.<br />Methods: This is a sub-study of the BOX trial, which included OHCA patients from two Danish tertiary cardiac intensive care units from March 2017 to December 2021. The main outcome was defined as 3-month survival with good neurological performance (Cerebral Performance Category of 1or 2, on a scale from 1 (good cerebral performance) to 5 (death or brain death)). For this study EMS witnessed OHCAs were excluded.<br />Results: Of the 715 patients, a lay responder arrived before EMS in 125 cases (16%). In total, 81 patients were defibrillated by a lay responder (11%), 69 patients by a bystander (10%) and 565 patients by the EMS staff (79%). The 3-month survival with good neurological outcome was 65% and 81% in the lay responder and bystander defibrillated groups, respectively (P = 0.03).<br />Conclusion: In patients with OHCA, 3-month survival with good neurological outcome was higher in bystander defibrillated patients compared with lay responder defibrillated patients.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: ‘The BOX Trial has been supported by a Novo Nordisk grant (NNF17OC0028706) from the Novo Nordisk Foundation. Prof. Hassager’s work is funded by a grant from the Lundbeck Foundation (R186-2015-2132), and Dr. Beske’s work is funded by a grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF20OC0064043). The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.’.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-1570
Volume :
195
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Resuscitation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38013147
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.110059