Back to Search Start Over

A Cluster Randomized Trial of Primary Care Practice Redesign to Integrate Behavioral Health for Those Who Need It Most: Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions.

Authors :
Littenberg B
Clifton J
Crocker AM
Baldwin LM
Bonnell LN
Breshears RE
Callas P
Chakravarti P
Clark/Keefe K
Cohen DJ
deGruy FV
Eidt-Pearson L
Elder W
Fox C
Frisbie S
Hekman K
Hitt J
Jewiss J
Kaelber DC
Kelley KS
Kessler R
O'Rourke-Lavoie JB
Leibowitz GS
Macchi CR
Martin MP
McGovern M
Mollis B
Mullin D
Nagykaldi Z
Natkin LW
Pace W
Pinckney RG
Pomeroy D
Reynolds P
Rose GL
Scholle SH
Sieber WJ
Soucie J
Stancin T
Stange KC
Stephens KA
Teng K
Waddell EN
van Eeghen C
Source :
Annals of family medicine [Ann Fam Med] 2023 Nov-Dec; Vol. 21 (6), pp. 483-495.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Purpose: Patient outcomes can improve when primary care and behavioral health providers use a collaborative system of care, but integrating these services is difficult. We tested the effectiveness of a practice intervention for improving patient outcomes by enhancing integrated behavioral health (IBH) activities.<br />Methods: We conducted a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial. The intervention combined practice redesign, quality improvement coaching, provider and staff education, and collaborative learning. At baseline and 2 years, staff at 42 primary care practices completed the Practice Integration Profile (PIP) as a measure of IBH. Adult patients with multiple chronic medical and behavioral conditions completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) survey. Primary outcomes were the change in 8 PROMIS-29 domain scores. Secondary outcomes included change in level of integration.<br />Results: Intervention assignment had no effect on change in outcomes reported by 2,426 patients who completed both baseline and 2-year surveys. Practices assigned to the intervention improved PIP workflow scores but not PIP total scores. Baseline PIP total score was significantly associated with patient-reported function, independent of intervention. Active practices that completed intervention workbooks (n = 13) improved patient-reported outcomes and practice integration ( P ≤ .05) compared with other active practices (n = 7).<br />Conclusion: Intervention assignment had no effect on change in patient outcomes; however, we did observe improved patient outcomes among practices that entered the study with greater IBH. We also observed more improvement of integration and patient outcomes among active practices that completed the intervention compared to active practices that did not. Additional research is needed to understand how implementation efforts to enhance IBH can best reach patients.<br /> (© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1544-1717
Volume :
21
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of family medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38012036
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3027