Back to Search Start Over

A cloudy forecast for species distribution models: Predictive uncertainties abound for California birds after a century of climate and land-use change.

Authors :
Clare JDJ
de Valpine P
Moanga DA
Tingley MW
Beissinger SR
Source :
Global change biology [Glob Chang Biol] 2024 Jan; Vol. 30 (1), pp. e17019. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 21.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Correlative species distribution models are widely used to quantify past shifts in ranges or communities, and to predict future outcomes under ongoing global change. Practitioners confront a wide range of potentially plausible models for ecological dynamics, but most specific applications only consider a narrow set. Here, we clarify that certain model structures can embed restrictive assumptions about key sources of forecast uncertainty into an analysis. To evaluate forecast uncertainties and our ability to explain community change, we fit and compared 39 candidate multi- or joint species occupancy models to avian incidence data collected at 320 sites across California during the early 20th century and resurveyed a century later. We found massive (>20,000 LOOIC) differences in within-time information criterion across models. Poorer fitting models omitting multivariate random effects predicted less variation in species richness changes and smaller contemporary communities, with considerable variation in predicted spatial patterns in richness changes across models. The top models suggested avian environmental associations changed across time, contemporary avian occupancy was influenced by previous site-specific occupancy states, and that both latent site variables and species associations with these variables also varied over time. Collectively, our results recapitulate that simplified model assumptions not only impact predictive fit but may mask important sources of forecast uncertainty and mischaracterize the current state of system understanding when seeking to describe or project community responses to global change. We recommend that researchers seeking to make long-term forecasts prioritize characterizing forecast uncertainty over seeking to present a single best guess. To do so reliably, we urge practitioners to employ models capable of characterizing the key sources of forecast uncertainty, where predictors, parameters and random effects may vary over time or further interact with previous occurrence states.<br /> (© 2023 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1365-2486
Volume :
30
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Global change biology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37987241
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17019