Back to Search
Start Over
Predictors of treatment response in therapy-resistant enuresis.
- Source :
-
Journal of pediatric urology [J Pediatr Urol] 2024 Apr; Vol. 20 (2), pp. 219.e1-219.e6. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 01. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: The voiding chart is part of the initial evaluation of enuresis, since the data gathered this way are assumed to carry predictive information. However, there is little evidence that the voiding chart actually does predict therapy response. Lundmark & Nevéus performed a pilot investigation in 2020 and found that anamnestic and voiding chart data did not predict response to second-line therapies. This study aims at evaluating whether these findings could be replicated.<br />Patients and Methods: This is an evaluation of clinical practice. All patients in a tertiary outpatient clinic with enuresis resistant to first-line therapy (i.e. the enuresis alarm and desmopressin medication) during the evaluation period were included in the study. Baseline anamnestic data focused on bladder and bowel habits, were gathered and the families were instructed to complete a voiding chart including measurements of nocturnal urine production. The children were then treated in accordance with international guidelines, which are anticholinergics and antidepressants as second- and third-line treatment, respectively. Desmopressin was added if needed.<br />Results: In total, 70 patients were included. At the end of the study 37 of these patients were dry, 11 patients were still wetting their beds and 22 patients were lost to follow-up. Of the dry patients 21 became dry on anticholinergics (and/or mirabegron, with or without desmopressin), five on tricyclic antidepressants (with or without desmopressin), seven after a new attempt with the alarm and five became dry spontaneously. The only statistically significant differences between responders and non-responders to the various treatments were that children responsive to anticholinergics had harder and more infrequent stools (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively).<br />Conclusion: This study found that anamnestic and voiding chart data do not predict response to treatment in children with therapy-resistant enuresis. Because of this and the fact that we lose some children who need our help by demanding that they complete a voiding chart before initiating treatment, we question the use of this instrument in the evaluation of therapy-resistant enuresis.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of interest None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1873-4898
- Volume :
- 20
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of pediatric urology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 37977907
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.10.036