Sediment respiration dynamics and its contribution to carbon emissions in stratified reservoirs.

Sediment respiration, the relation between dissolved oxygen (DO) attribution and carbon dioxide (CO ₂ ) emission, is an important index of the aquatic ecosystem and a key concern in the evaluation of reservoir cleanliness performance. To understand the sediment respiration dynamics regulated by the thermal stratification that is common in deep-water reservoirs, this study conducted in-situ measurements of thermal structures and benthic environments in the Daheiting Reservoir for 16 months. Then, the variations of DO and CO ₂ fluxes at the sediment-water interface (SWI) were obtained based on the aquatic eddy correlation method and the newly proposed virtual incubator method, respectively. The results show that the SWI fluxes dynamics can be decomposed into tendency variations dominated by thermal stratification and impulse variations induced by extreme events. The annual average SWI DO and CO ₂ fluxes of 3.80-6.62 and 1.92-3.15 mmol m ^-2 ·d ^-1 are estimated in the study site through the respiration dynamics, respectively, which CO ₂ flux is at a moderate level among the nearly 50 lakes and reservoirs worldwide but accounts for less than 15% of the total CO ₂ emission of this reservoir. Moreover, the sediment respiration quotient in stratified reservoirs is lower than in other aquatic environments, suggesting that the permanently flooded area is a weak net carbon source, while most carbon emissions from stratified reservoirs are carbon displacement or net carbon generated within the water. Sediment net carbon emissions correspond to human benefits such as flood control, power generation, and fisheries, whereas water net carbon emissions are usually not beneficial. Therefore, reducing net carbon emissions generated in the water may become an important way to achieve low-carbon operation of deep-water reservoirs.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)