Back to Search Start Over

Impact of Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve on Downstream Management and Clinical Outcomes in Individuals with and without Diabetes.

Authors :
Gulsin GS
Tzimas G
Holmes KR
Takagi H
Sellers SL
Blanke P
Koweek LMH
Nørgaard BL
Jensen J
Rabbat MG
Pontone G
Fairbairn TA
Chinnaiyan KM
Douglas PS
Huey W
Matsuo H
Sand NPR
Nieman K
Bax JJ
Amano T
Kawasaki T
Akasaka T
Rogers C
Berman DS
Patel MR
De Bruyne B
Mullen S
Leipsic JA
Source :
Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging [Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging] 2023 Oct 19; Vol. 5 (5), pp. e220276. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 19 (Print Publication: 2023).
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the clinical use of coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).<br />Materials and Methods: This secondary analysis included participants (enrolled July 2015 to October 2017) from the prospective, multicenter, international The Assessing Diagnostic Value of Noninvasive CT-FFR in Coronary Care (ADVANCE) registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02499679) who were evaluated for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), with one or more coronary stenosis ≥30% on CCTA images, using CT-FFR. CCTA and CT-FFR findings, treatment strategies at 90 days, and clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared in participants with and without DM.<br />Results: The study included 4290 participants (mean age, 66 years ± 10 [SD]; 66% male participants; 22% participants with DM). Participants with DM had more obstructive CAD (one or more coronary stenosis ≥50%; 78.8% vs 70.6%, P < .001), multivessel CAD (three-vessel obstructive CAD; 18.9% vs 11.2%, P < .001), and proportionally more vessels with CT-FFR ≤ 0.8 (74.3% vs 64.6%, P < .001). Treatment reclassification by CT-FFR occurred in two-thirds of participants which was consistent regardless of the presence of DM. There was a similar graded increase in coronary revascularization with declining CT-FFR in both groups. At 1 year, presence of DM was associated with higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% CI: 1.2, 4.1; P = .01). However, no between group differences were observed when stratified by stenosis severity (<50% or ≥50%) or CT-FFR positivity.<br />Conclusion: Both anatomic CCTA findings and CT-FFR demonstrated a more complex pattern of CAD in participants with versus without DM. Rates of treatment reclassification were similar regardless of the presence of DM, and DM was not an adverse prognostic indicator when adjusted for diameter stenosis and CT-FFR.Clinical trial registration no. NCT 02499679 Keywords: Fractional Flow Reserve, CT Angiography, Diabetes Mellitus, Coronary Artery Disease Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the commentary by Ghoshhajra in this issue.© RSNA, 2023.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosures of conflicts of interest: G.S.G. Trainee editorial board member for Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging. G.T. Supported by the Fondation Vaudoise de Cardiologie and the SICPA Foundation. K.R.H. No relevant relationships. H.T. Grants from Canon Medical Systems and JSPS KAKENHI (grant no. 23K15150); speaking fee from HeartFlow Japan. S.L.S. Grants paid to institution from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, HeartFlow; consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Anteris Technologies, and Medtronic; equipment loan agreement from ViVitro Labs. P.B. Consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences; L.M.H.K. Funding to department from HeartFlow; member of the Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging editorial board. B.L.N. Unrestricted institutional research grants from Siemens Healthineers and HeartFlow. J.J. No relevant relationships. M.G.R. Consulting fees from HeartFlow. G.P. Funding from HeartFlow. T.A.F. No relevant relationships. K.M.C. Institutional grant from HeartFlow; honoraria from Elucid Bioimaging. P.S.D. Grant to institution from HeartFlow; honorarium from UpToDate; support from Caption Health. W.H. Employee of HeartFlow; stock options in HeartFlow. H.M. No relevant relationships. N.P.R.S. No relevant relationships. K.N. Grants from Siemens Healthineers, GE HealthCare, and HeartFlow; consulting fees from Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Elucid, and Novartis; stock options in Lumen Therapeutics. J.J.B. No relevant relationships. T. Amano No relevant relationships. T.K. No relevant relationships. T. Akasaka No relevant relationships. T.R. Support (salary and equity) from HeartFlow. D.S.B. Software royalties from Cedars-Sinai; consulting fees from GE and Bayer. M.R.P. Grants from HeartFlow, Bayer, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis; consulting fees from Bayer, Hanssen Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis. B.D.B. No relevant relationships. S.M. Employee and shareholder of HeartFlow. J.A.L. Grants from GE HealthCare; consulting fees and stock options from HeartFlow and Circle Cardiovascular Imaging; personal core lab services from Arineta; speaking fees from Philips and GE HealthCare; stock options in HeartFlow and Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, deputy editor for Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging.<br /> (© 2023 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2638-6135
Volume :
5
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37908552
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.220276