Back to Search Start Over

Spinal kinematic variability is increased in people with chronic low back pain during a repetitive lifting task.

Authors :
Alsubaie AM
Sanderson A
Cabral HV
Martinez-Valdes E
Falla D
Source :
Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology [J Electromyogr Kinesiol] 2023 Dec; Vol. 73, pp. 102832. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 14.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Changes in spinal kinematic variability have been observed in people with chronic non-specific LBP (CNSLBP) during the performance of various repetitive functional tasks. However, the direction of these changes (i.e., less or more kinematic variability) is not consistent. This study aimed to assess differences in kinematic variability of the 3D angular displacement of thoracic and lumbar spinal segments in people with CNSLBP compared to asymptomatic individuals during a repetitive lifting task. Eleven people with CNSLBP and 11 asymptomatic volunteers performed 10 cycles of multi-planar lifting movements while spinal kinematics were recorded. For the three planes of motion, point-by-point standard deviations (SDs) were computed across all cycles of lifting and the average was calculated as a measure of kinematic variability for both segments. People with CNSLBP displayed higher thoracic (F = 8.00, p = 0.010, ηp <superscript>2</superscript>  = 0.286) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 5.48, p = 0.030, ηp <superscript>2</superscript>  = 0.215) in the sagittal plane. Moreover, group differences were observed in the transversal plane for thoracic (F = 7.62, p = 0.012, ηp <superscript>2</superscript>  = 0.276) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 5.402, p = 0.031, ηp <superscript>2</superscript>  = 0.213), as well as in the frontal plane for thoracic (F = 7.27, p = 0.014, ηp <superscript>2</superscript>  = 0.267) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 6.11, p = 0.022, ηp <superscript>2</superscript>  = 0.234), all showing higher variability in those with CNSLBP. A significant main effect of group was not detected (p > 0.05) for spinal range of motion (ROM). Thus, people with CNSLBP completed the lifting task with the same ROM in all three planes of motion as observed for asymptomatic individuals, yet they performed the lifting task with higher spinal kinematic cycle-to-cycle variation.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-5711
Volume :
73
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37897835
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102832