Subxiphoid versus lateral intercostal thoracoscopic thymectomy for suspected thymoma: Results of a randomized controlled trial.

Objective: This trial was to evaluate the efficacy of subxiphoid approach thoracoscopic thymectomy for postoperative pain control and length of hospital stay compared with a lateral intercostal approach thoracoscopic thymectomy.
Methods: This multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical superiority trial enrolled 101 eligible participants clinically diagnosed with Masaoka-Koga I-II thymoma between August 15, 2021, and February 15, 2022. Each enrolled participant was randomized and underwent subxiphoid approach thoracoscopic thymectomy or lateral intercostal approach thoracoscopic thymectomy. A per-protocol analysis for each coprimary outcome was performed in addition to the main intention-to-treat analysis.
Results: In the analysis for the coprimary outcomes, the pain Visual Analog Scale score area under the curve at 0 to 7 days was lower in the subxiphoid approach thoracoscopic thymectomy group than in the lateral intercostal approach thoracoscopic thymectomy group (difference, -4.82; 98.3% CI, -8.84 to -0.80). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the length of hospital stay (difference, 0.318; 98.3% CI, -0.190 to 0.825) or cumulative opioid consumption after surgery (difference, -4.630; 98.3% CI, -9.530 to 0.272). All patients underwent complete resection, and there was no significant difference (7.84% vs 8.00%, P = 1.000) in the rate of complications between the 2 groups. No recurrence or death occurred in the postoperative 6 months.
Conclusions: This study found improved pain and similar length of hospital stay associated with the subxiphoid approach compared with the lateral intercostal approach in patients with suspected Masaoka-Koga I-II thymoma.
Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2023 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)