Back to Search Start Over

Comparative Study Between Single Layer and Double Layer Graft Technique in Tympanoplasty for Subtotal Tympanic Membrane Perforation.

Authors :
Aziz AARA
Hafez MAS
Mahmoud AG
Hamad AH
Source :
International archives of otorhinolaryngology [Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol] 2023 Mar 03; Vol. 27 (4), pp. e667-e671. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Mar 03 (Print Publication: 2023).
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Introduction  Tympanoplasty is the main treatment of mucosal type of chronic suppurative otitis media. Objective  The aim of the present study was to compare clinical outcomes in terms of healing and audiological outcomes of two groups. The authors used single layer graft (perichondrium with cartilage island) graft in one group and double layer grafts (perichondrium cartilage island composite plus temporalis fascia) were used in the second group. Methods  Forty patients complained of chronic suppurative otitis media safe type with subtotal perforation subdivided into two groups. The first group author used single-layer perichondrium with cartilage island graft (composite graft) while in the second group authors used double graft in the form of perichondrium/cartilage island (composite graft) plus temporalis fascia. Results  There was no significant difference in the mean Air bone gap (ABG) between pre- and post-operative audiometry in subjects who had single layer tympanoplasty. There was a significant difference in the mean ABG between pre- and postoperative audiometry in subjects who had double layer tympanoplasty. There was a significant difference in in the mean ABG differences between subjects who had single layer tympanoplasty and double layer tympanoplasty. Also, there was a significant difference in the healing of the tympanic membrane between subjects who had single layer tympanoplasty and double layer tympanoplasty. Conclusion  Tympanoplasty by double graft (temporalis fascia and tragal cartilage/perichondrium) achieved a considerable improvement in healing of the tympanic membrane ™ with lower risk for residual perforation or graft rejection.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of Interests The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.<br /> (Fundação Otorrinolaringologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1809-9777
Volume :
27
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International archives of otorhinolaryngology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37876686
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1761174