Development and model form assessment of an automatic subject-specific vertebra reconstruction method.

Background: Current spine models for analog bench models, surgical navigation and training platforms are conventionally based on 3D models from anatomical human body polygon database or from time-consuming manual-labelled data. This work proposed a workflow of quick and accurate subject-specific vertebra reconstruction method and quantified the reconstructed model accuracy and model form errors.
Methods: Four different neural networks were customized for vertebra segmentation. To validate the workflow in clinical applications, an excised human lumbar vertebra was scanned via CT and reconstructed into 3D CAD models using four refined networks. A reverse engineering solution was proposed to obtain the high-precision geometry of the excised vertebra as gold standard. The 3D model evaluation metrics and a finite element analysis (FEA) method were designed to reflect the model accuracy and model form errors.
Results: The automatic segmentation networks achieved the best Dice score of 94.20% in validation datasets. The accuracy of reconstructed models was quantified with the best 3D Dice index of 92.80%, 3D IoU of 86.56%, Hausdorff distance of 1.60 mm, and the heatmaps and histograms were used for error visualization. The FEA results showed the impact of different geometries and reflected partial surface accuracy of the reconstructed vertebra under biomechanical loads with the closest percentage error of 4.2710% compared to the gold standard model.
Conclusions: In this work, a workflow of automatic subject-specific vertebra reconstruction method was proposed while the errors in geometry and FEA were quantified. Such errors should be considered when leveraging subject-specific modelling towards the development and improvement of treatments.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)