Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of the prognostic value between quantification and visual estimation of coronary calcification from attenuation CT in patients undergoing SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors :
Feher A
Pieszko K
Shanbhag A
Lemley M
Miller RJ
Huang C
Miras L
Liu YH
Gerber J
Sinusas AJ
Miller EJ
Slomka PJ
Source :
The international journal of cardiovascular imaging [Int J Cardiovasc Imaging] 2024 Jan; Vol. 40 (1), pp. 185-193. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 17.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

We investigated the prognostic utility of visually estimated coronary artery calcification (VECAC) from low dose computed tomography attenuation correction (CTAC) scans obtained during SPECT/CT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), and assessed how it compares to coronary artery calcifications (CAC) quantified by calcium score on CTACs (QCAC). From the REFINE SPECT Registry 4,236 patients without prior coronary stenting with SPECT/CT performed at a single center were included (age: 64 ± 12 years, 47% female). VECAC in each coronary artery (left main, left anterior descending, circumflex, and right) were scored separately as 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe), yielding a possible score of 0-12 for each patient (overall VECAC grade zero:0, mild:1-2, moderate: 3-5, severe: >5). CAC scoring of CTACs was performed at the REFINE SPECT core lab with dedicated software. VECAC was correlated with categorized QCAC (zero: 0, mild: 1-99, moderate: 100-399, severe: ≥400). A high degree of correlation was observed between VECAC and QCAC, with 73% of VECACs in the same category as QCAC and 98% within one category. There was substantial agreement between VECAC and QCAC (weighted kappa: 0.78 with 95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.79, p < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 25 months, 372 patients (9%) experienced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). In survival analysis, both VECAC and QCAC were associated with MACE. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for 2-year-MACE was similar for VECAC when compared to QCAC (0.694 versus 0.691, p = 0.70). In conclusion, visual assessment of CAC on low-dose CTAC scans provides good estimation of QCAC in patients undergoing SPECT/CT MPI. Visually assessed CAC has similar prognostic value for MACE in comparison to QCAC.<br /> (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1875-8312
Volume :
40
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The international journal of cardiovascular imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37845406
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02980-1