Once-daily versus divided dosing regimens of clozapine: A cross-sectional study in Singapore.

Introduction: Clozapine is recognized as the gold standard medication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Despite the general recommendation of administering in a divided dosing regimen, clozapine is often prescribed once daily at night in clinical practice. This study aims to compare patient characteristics, psychiatric symptoms, side effects, and plasma concentration of clozapine between once-daily dosing and divided dosing regimens.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 159 participants with treatment-resistant schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Participant's demographic information, anthropometric data, and medical history were collected. Their psychiatric symptoms, cognition, functioning, and side effects were evaluated.
Results: Once-daily dosing regimen was associated with younger age and competitive employment. Lower clinical symptom severity, better functioning and cognitive performance were observed in the once-daily dosing group. Lower daily dose of clozapine, trough plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine were also significantly associated with once-daily dosing regimen.
Conclusion: The study results support once-daily dosing of clozapine as a viable option to selected patients in clinical practice, as no association of severe symptoms or side effects were associated with once-daily dosing regimen. More studies are needed to examine the relationship between clinical outcomes and clozapine dosing regimen.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest HT has received grants from Daiichi Sankyo and Novartis Pharma; speaker's fees from EA Pharma, Eisai, Kyowa, Janssen, Lundbeck, Meiji Seika Pharma, MSD, Otsuka, Sumitomo Pharma, Takeda, and Yoshitomiyakuhin; and consulting fees from Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Ono, and Sumitomo Pharma. JL has received honoraria from Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck Singapore, Otsuka Pharmaceutical and Janssen Pharmaceutical. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. All other authors report no conflicts of interests.
(Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)