Back to Search Start Over

Agreement Between Published Reference Resources for Neurofilament Light Chain Levels in People With Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors :
Sotirchos ES
Hu C
Smith MD
Lord HN
DuVal AL
Arrambide G
Montalban X
Akgün K
Ziemssen T
Naismith RT
Hersh CM
Hyland M
Krupp LB
Nicholas JA
Bermel RA
Mowry EM
Calabresi PA
Fitzgerald KC
Source :
Neurology [Neurology] 2023 Dec 04; Vol. 101 (23), pp. e2448-e2453. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 04.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the agreement between published reference resources for neurofilament light chain (NfL) applied to a large population of people with multiple sclerosis (MS).<br />Methods: Six published reference resources were used to classify NfL in participants in the Multiple Sclerosis Partners Advancing Technology and Health Solutions (MS PATHS) network as elevated or normal and to derive age-specific NfL Z -scores. NfL values were classified as elevated if they exceeded the >95th percentile (i.e., Z -score >1.645) of the age-specific reference range. Furthermore, age-specific NfL Z -scores could be derived for 4 of 6 reference resources.<br />Results: NfL measurements were assessed from 12,855 visits of 6,687 people with MS (median 2 samples per individual [range 1-7]). The mean ± SD age was 47.1 ± 11.7 years, 72.1% of participants were female, disease duration was 15.0 ± 10.6 years, body mass index was 28.6 ± 6.9 kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> , and serum NfL was 12.87 ± 12.86 pg/mL. Depending on the selection of the reference resource, the proportion of NfL measurements classified as elevated varied from 3.7% to 30.9%. The kappa coefficient across the 6 reference resources used was 0.576 (95% CI 0.571-0.580) indicating moderate agreement. Spearman correlations between Z -scores derived from the various reference resources exceeded 0.90; however, concordance coefficients were lower, ranging from 0.72 to 0.89.<br />Discussion: Interpretation of blood NfL values may vary markedly depending on the selection of the reference resource. Borderline elevated values should be interpreted with caution, and future studies should focus on standardizing NfL measurement and reporting across laboratories/platforms, better characterizing the effects of confounding/influencing factors, and defining the performance of NfL (including as part of multimodal predictive algorithms) for prediction of disease-specific outcomes.<br /> (© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1526-632X
Volume :
101
Issue :
23
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Neurology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37816633
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000207957