Back to Search Start Over

Digital Rectal Examination Is Not a Useful Screening Test for Prostate Cancer.

Authors :
Krilaviciute A
Becker N
Lakes J
Radtke JP
Kuczyk M
Peters I
Harke NN
Debus J
Koerber SA
Herkommer K
Gschwend JE
Meissner VH
Benner A
Seibold P
Kristiansen G
Hadaschik B
Arsov C
Schimmöller L
Giesel FL
Antoch G
Makowski M
Wacker F
Schlemmer HP
Kaaks R
Albers P
Source :
European urology oncology [Eur Urol Oncol] 2023 Dec; Vol. 6 (6), pp. 566-573. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 06.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Annual digital rectal examination (DRE) is recommended as a stand-alone screening test for prostate cancer (PCa) in Germany for 45+ yr olds. DRE diagnostic performance in men as young as 45 yr old has not been proved by a screening trial.<br />Objective: To determine DRE diagnostic performance in a screening trial.<br />Design, Setting, and Participants: This analysis was conducted within the multicentric, randomized PROBASE trial, which enrolled >46 000 men at age 45 to test risk-adapted prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for PCa.<br />Intervention: (1) DRE was analyzed as a one-time, stand-alone screening offer at age 45 in 6537 men in one arm of the trial and (2) PCa detection by DRE was evaluated at the time of PSA-screen-driven biopsies (N = 578).<br />Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: (1) True-/false-positive detection rates of DRE as compared with PSA screening and (2) DRE outcome at the time of a prostate biopsy were evaluated.<br />Results and Limitations: (1) A prospective analysis of 57 men with suspicious DRE at age 45 revealed three PCa. Detection rate by DRE was 0.05% (three of 6537) as compared with a four-fold higher rate by PSA screening (48 of 23 301, 0.21%). The true-positive detection rate by DRE relative to screening by PSA was 0.22 (95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.07-0.72]) and the false-positive detection rate by DRE was 2.2 (95% CI = [1.50-3.17]). (2) Among PSA-screen-detected PCa cases, 86% had unsuspicious DRE (sensitivity relative to PSA was 14%), with the majority of these tumors (86%) located in the potentially accessible zones of the prostate as seen by magnetic resonance imaging.<br />Conclusions: The performance of stand-alone DRE to screen for PCa is poor. DRE should not be recommended as a PCa screening test in young men. Furthermore, DRE does not improve the detection of PSA-screen-detected PCa.<br />Patient Summary: Our report demonstrated the poor diagnostic performance of digital rectal examination in the screening for prostate cancer in young men.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2588-9311
Volume :
6
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European urology oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37806841
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.008