Back to Search Start Over

A Hospital-Wide Open-Label Cluster Crossover Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Trial Comparing Normal Saline to Ringer's Lactate: Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan of The FLUID Trial.

Authors :
Shaw JF
Ouyang Y
Fergusson DA
McArdle T
Martin C
Cook D
Graham ID
Hawken S
McCartney CJL
Menon K
Saginur R
Seely A
Stiell I
Fox-Robichaud A
English S
Marshall J
Thavorn K
Taljaard M
McIntyre LA
Source :
JMIR research protocols [JMIR Res Protoc] 2023 Oct 06; Vol. 12, pp. e51783. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 06.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Normal saline (NS) and Ringer's lactate (RL) are the most common crystalloids given to hospitalized patients. Despite concern about possible harm associated with NS (eg, hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, impaired kidney function, and death), few large multicenter randomized trials focused on critically ill patients have compared these fluids. Uncertainty exists about the effects of these fluids on clinically important outcomes across all hospitalized patients.<br />Objective: The FLUID trial is a pragmatic, multicenter, 2×2 cluster crossover comparative effectiveness randomized trial that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a hospital-wide policy that stocks either NS or RL as the main crystalloid fluid in 16 hospitals across Ontario, Canada.<br />Methods: All hospitalized adult and pediatric patients (anticipated sample size 144,000 patients) with an incident admission to the hospital over the course of each study period will be included. Either NS or RL will be preferentially stocked throughout the hospital for 12 weeks before crossing to the alternate fluid for the subsequent 12 weeks. The primary outcome is a composite of death and hospital readmission within 90 days of hospitalization. Secondary outcomes include death, hospital readmission, dialysis, reoperation, postoperative reintubation, length of hospital stay, emergency department visits, and discharge to a facility other than home. All outcomes will be obtained from health administrative data, eliminating the need for individual case reports. The primary analysis will use cluster-level summaries to estimate cluster-average treatment effects.<br />Results: The statistical analysis plan has been prepared "a priori" in advance of receipt of the trial data set from ICES and any analyses.<br />Conclusions: We describe the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the evaluation of primary and secondary outcomes for the FLUID trial.<br />Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04512950; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04512950.<br />International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/51783.<br /> (©Julia F Shaw, Yongdong Ouyang, Dean A Fergusson, Tracy McArdle, Claudio Martin, Deborah Cook, Ian D Graham, Steven Hawken, Colin J L McCartney, Kusum Menon, Raphael Saginur, Andrew Seely, Ian Stiell, Alison Fox-Robichaud, Shane English, John Marshall, Kednapa Thavorn, Monica Taljaard, Lauralyn A McIntyre, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 06.10.2023.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1929-0748
Volume :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JMIR research protocols
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37801356
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2196/51783