Back to Search Start Over

Analytical and clinical evaluations of SNIBE Maglumi chemiluminescent immunoassay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen in salivary samples.

Authors :
Padoan A
Talli I
Cosma C
Moz S
Furlan G
Navaglia F
Marchioro L
Zaninotto M
Basso D
Plebani M
Source :
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine [Clin Chem Lab Med] 2023 Oct 04; Vol. 62 (3), pp. 572-577. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 04 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we describe the analytical and clinical performances of the SNIBE Maglumi SARS-CoV-2 antigen fully-automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (MAG-CLIA) on salivary samples.<br />Methods: Limit of detection (LOD), linearity and precision were tested for values close to or below the declared LOD. Clinical performance of MAG-CLIA was evaluated on leftover salivary samples from the healthcare workers (HCW) surveillance program, at the University-Hospital of Padova. Salivary samples were analyzed by Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag, and in case where the values exceeded 0.41 ng/L, further testing was conducted using TaqPathTM COVID-19 RT-PCR (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific).<br />Results: The estimated MAG-CLIA LOD was 3 ng/L, with repeatability of 7.5 %. Good linearity was demonstrated by diluting two samples at 52.7 ng/L and 211.4 ng/L. Of the 228 HCW samples, 59/228 (25.9 %) were positive, 169/228 (74.1 %) were negative. MAG-CLIA SARS-CoV-2 sAg median level (and interquartile range [IQR]) was 5.03 ng/L (<0.001-35.8 ng/L) for positive and <0.001 ng/L (<0.001 ng/L) for negative samples. MAG-CLIA AUC was 0.795 (95 % CI: 0.720-0.871). Using the best cut-off, 3.5 ng/L, sensitivity and specificity were 57.1 % (95 % CI: 42.2-71.2 %) and 97.0 % (95 % CI: 93.2-99.0 %), respectively. The agreement with the molecular assay was 88.1 % (Cohen's kappa 0.606 [SE=0.066, p<0.001]).<br />Conclusions: The analytical performances of MAG-CLIA are satisfactory, also when values below LOD were tested. In saliva samples, although specificity was elevated, clinical performance was not comparable with that on nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS).<br /> (© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1437-4331
Volume :
62
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37787733
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0947