A common low dimensional structure of cognitive impairment in stroke and brain tumors.

Introduction: Neuropsychological studies infer brain-behavior relationships from focal lesions like stroke and tumors. However, these pathologies impair brain function through different mechanisms even when they occur at the same brain's location. The aim of this study was to compare the profile of cognitive impairment in patients with brain tumors vs. stroke and examine the correlation with lesion location in each pathology.
Methods: Patients with first time stroke (n = 77) or newly diagnosed brain tumors (n = 76) were assessed with a neuropsychological battery. Their lesions were mapped with MRI scans. Test scores were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) to measure their correlation, and logistic regression to examine differences between pathologies. Next, with ridge regression we examined whether lesion features (location, volume) were associated with behavioral performance.
Results: The PCA showed a similar cognitive impairment profile in tumors and strokes with three principal components (PCs) accounting for about half of the individual variance. PC1 loaded on language, verbal memory, and executive/working memory; PC2 loaded on general performance, visuo-spatial attention and memory, and executive functions; and, PC3 loaded on calculation, reading and visuo-spatial attention. The average lesion distribution was different, and lesion location was correlated with cognitive deficits only in stroke. Logistic regression found language and calculation more affected in stroke, and verbal memory and verbal fluency more affected in tumors.
Conclusions: A similar low dimensional set of behavioral impairments was found both in stroke and brain tumors, even though each pathology caused some specific deficits in different domains. The lesion distribution was different for stroke and tumors and correlated with behavioral impairment only in stroke.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)