Back to Search Start Over

Effects of an ethanol-paired conditioned stimulus on responding for ethanol suppressed by a conditioned-taste-aversion.

Authors :
Lamb RJ
Schindler CW
Ginsburg BC
Source :
Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.) [Alcohol] 2024 May; Vol. 116, pp. 1-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Sep 28.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Ethanol-Paired Conditioned Stimuli (CS) can increase ethanol-responding either in extinction or occurring at low rates late in a session. To examine the generality of CS-induced increases in ethanol-responding, we examined whether a CS could increase responding suppressed by Conditioned-Taste-Aversion (CTA), which presumably suppresses responding by changing ethanol's valence from positive to negative. Rats were trained to respond for ethanol under a Random Interval (RI) schedule. We then removed the lever and paired Random-Time ethanol deliveries with illumination of a stimulus light (i.e., CS) for 10 sessions. Results were compared with a Truly Random Control group, in which the light and ethanol deliveries occurred independently. In a subsequent experiment, rats were treated similarly, except the light served as a discriminative stimulus, as the lever was extended and ethanol deliveries were available under a RI during light presentations. After this training, the lever was returned and rats again responded for ethanol. Subsequently, sessions were followed by LiCl administration. When responding reached low levels, LiCl administration stopped and the light was occasionally illuminated during the session. Responding during the light presentation was compared to responding during the period preceding light presentation. Responding partially recovered across 10 sessions and was greater during light presentations than in the period before it in all three groups. Increases were not reliably different between the groups, indicating that explanations for these increases such as CS-induced increases in motivation or approach toward the light are unlikely to be correct. The most likely explanation for these light-induced increases is that during sessions in which the light had been presented previously, LiCl had never been presented and thus, the light had come to signal that ethanol was safe to drink.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-6823
Volume :
116
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37774959
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcohol.2023.09.008