Back to Search Start Over

Early palliative care versus usual haematological care in multiple myeloma: retrospective cohort study.

Authors :
Giusti D
Colaci E
Pioli V
Banchelli F
Maccaferri M
Leonardi G
Marasca R
Morselli M
Forghieri F
Bettelli F
Cuoghi A
Bresciani P
Messerotti A
Gilioli A
Candoni A
Cassanelli L
Sbadili E
Bassoli I
Longo G
Gilioli F
Borelli E
Bigi S
D'Amico R
Porro CA
Odejide O
Zimmermann C
Efficace F
Bruera E
Luppi M
Bandieri E
Potenza L
Source :
BMJ supportive & palliative care [BMJ Support Palliat Care] 2024 Aug 19; Vol. 14 (3), pp. 291-294. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 19.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objectives: Although early palliative care (EPC) is beneficial in acute myeloid leukaemia, little is known about EPC value in multiple myeloma (MM). We compared quality indicators for palliative and end-of-life (EOL) care in patients with MM receiving EPC with those of patients who received usual haematological care (UHC).<br />Methods: This observational, retrospective study was based on 290 consecutive patients with MM. The following indicators were abstracted: providing psychological support, assessing/managing pain, discussing goals of care, promoting advance care plan, accessing home care services; no anti-MM treatment within 14 and 30 days and hospice length of stay >7 days before death; no cardiopulmonary resuscitation, no intubation, <2 hospitalisations and emergency department visits within 30 days before death. Comparisons were performed using unadjusted and confounder-adjusted regression models.<br />Results: 55 patients received EPC and 231 UHC. Compared with UHC patients, EPC patients had a significantly higher number of quality indicators of care (mean 2.62±1.25 vs 1.12±0.95; p<0.0001)); a significant reduction of pain intensity over time (p<0.01) and a trend towards reduced aggressiveness at EOL, with the same survival (5.3 vs 5.46 years; p=0.74)).<br />Conclusions: Our data support the value of integrating EPC into MM routine practice and lay the groundwork for future prospective comparative studies.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: FF: advisory boards for Jannsen and Novartis and travel grants from Jazz Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. RM: honoraria from AbbVie, Roche, Janssen, and Shire, outside the submitted work. FE: consultancy for Abbvie, Amgen, Janssen, Orsenix, Takeda, and grants from Amgen (to his Institution), outside the submitted work. EB: grants from Helsinn Healthcare, outside of the submitted work. ML: advisory board Abbvie, Novartis, Gilead science, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, Travel grant Gilead science.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2045-4368
Volume :
14
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMJ supportive & palliative care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37751995
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2023-004524