Back to Search Start Over

Pathologist Computer-Aided Diagnostic Scoring of Tumor Cell Fraction: A Swiss National Study.

Authors :
Frei AL
Oberson R
Baumann E
Perren A
Grobholz R
Lugli A
Dawson H
Abbet C
Lertxundi I
Reinhard S
Mookhoek A
Feichtinger J
Sarro R
Gadient G
Dommann-Scherrer C
Barizzi J
Berezowska S
Glatz K
Dertinger S
Banz Y
Schoenegg R
Rubbia-Brandt L
Fleischmann A
Saile G
Mainil-Varlet P
Biral R
Giudici L
Soltermann A
Chaubert AB
Stadlmann S
Diebold J
Egervari K
Bénière C
Saro F
Janowczyk A
Zlobec I
Source :
Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc [Mod Pathol] 2023 Dec; Vol. 36 (12), pp. 100335. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Sep 22.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Tumor cell fraction (TCF) estimation is a common clinical task with well-established large interobserver variability. It thus provides an ideal test bed to evaluate potential impacts of employing a tumor cell fraction computer-aided diagnostic (TCFCAD) tool to support pathologists' evaluation. During a National Slide Seminar event, pathologists (n = 69) were asked to visually estimate TCF in 10 regions of interest (ROIs) from hematoxylin and eosin colorectal cancer images intentionally curated for diverse tissue compositions, cellularity, and stain intensities. Next, they re-evaluated the same ROIs while being provided a TCFCAD-created overlay highlighting predicted tumor vs nontumor cells, together with the corresponding TCF percentage. Participants also reported confidence levels in their assessments using a 5-tier scale, indicating no confidence to high confidence, respectively. The TCF ground truth (GT) was defined by manual cell-counting by experts. When assisted, interobserver variability significantly decreased, showing estimates converging to the GT. This improvement remained even when TCFCAD predictions deviated slightly from the GT. The standard deviation (SD) of the estimated TCF to the GT across ROIs was 9.9% vs 5.8% with TCFCAD (P < .0001). The intraclass correlation coefficient increased from 0.8 to 0.93 (95% CI, 0.65-0.93 vs 0.86-0.98), and pathologists stated feeling more confident when aided (3.67 ± 0.81 vs 4.17 ± 0.82 with the computer-aided diagnostic [CAD] tool). TCFCAD estimation support demonstrated improved scoring accuracy, interpathologist agreement, and scoring confidence. Interestingly, pathologists also expressed more willingness to use such a CAD tool at the end of the survey, highlighting the importance of training/education to increase adoption of CAD systems.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1530-0285
Volume :
36
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37742926
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100335