Back to Search Start Over

Intravenous Ketorolac Substantially Reduces Opioid Use and Length of Stay After Lumbar Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors :
Iyer S
Steinhaus ME
Kazarian GS
Zgonis EM
Cunningham ME
Farmer JC
Kim HJ
Lebl DR
Huang RC
Lafage V
Schwab FJ
Qureshi S
Girardi FP
Rawlins BA
Beckman JD
Carrino JA
Chazen JL
Varghese JJ
Muzammil H
Lafage R
Sandhu HS
Source :
Spine [Spine (Phila Pa 1976)] 2024 Jan 15; Vol. 49 (2), pp. 73-80. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Sep 22.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Study Design: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.<br />Objective: To examine the effect of intravenous ketorolac (IV-K) on hospital opioid use compared with IV-placebo (IV-P) and IV acetaminophen (IV-A).<br />Summary of Background Data: Controlling postoperative pain while minimizing opioid use after lumbar spinal fusion is an important area of study.<br />Patients and Methods: Patients aged 18 to 75 years undergoing 1 to 2 level lumbar fusions between April 2016 and December 2019 were included. Patients with chronic opioid use, smokers, and those on systemic glucocorticoids or contraindications to study medications were excluded. A block randomization scheme was used, and study personnel, hospital staff, and subjects were blinded to the assignment. Patients were randomized postoperatively. The IV-K group received 15 mg (age > 65) or 30 mg (age < 65) every six hours (q6h) for 48 hours, IV-A received 1000 mg q6h, and IV-P received normal saline q6h for 48 hours. Demographic and surgical details, opioid use in morphine milliequivalents, opioid-related adverse events, and length of stay (LOS) were recorded. The primary outcome was in-hospital opioid use up to 72 hours.<br />Results: A total of 171 patients were included (58 IV-K, 55 IV-A, and 58 IV-P) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, with a mean age of 57.1 years. The IV-K group had lower opioid use at 72 hours (173 ± 157 mg) versus IV-A (255 ± 179 mg) and IV-P (299 ± 179 mg; P = 0.000). In terms of opiate use, IV-K was superior to IV-A ( P = 0.025) and IV-P ( P = 0.000) on ITT analysis, although on per-protocol analysis, the difference with IV-A did not reach significance ( P = 0.063). When compared with IV-P, IV-K patients reported significantly lower worst ( P = 0.004), best ( P = 0.001), average ( P = 0.001), and current pain ( P = 0.002) on postoperative day 1, and significantly shorter LOS ( P = 0.009) on ITT analysis. There were no differences in opioid-related adverse events, drain output, clinical outcomes, transfusion rates, or fusion rates.<br />Conclusions: By reducing opioid use, improving pain control on postoperative day 1, and decreasing LOS without increases in complications or pseudarthrosis, IV-K may be an important component of "enhanced recovery after surgery" protocols.<br />Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1528-1159
Volume :
49
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Spine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37737686
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004831