Back to Search Start Over

Heterogeneity in defining multiple trauma: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors :
Jeanmougin T
Cole E
Duceau B
Raux M
James A
Source :
Critical care (London, England) [Crit Care] 2023 Sep 22; Vol. 27 (1), pp. 363. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Sep 22.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Introduction: While numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted in the field of trauma, a substantial portion of them are yielding negative results. One potential contributing factor to this trend could be the lack of agreement regarding the chosen definitions across different trials. The primary objective was to identify the terminology and definitions utilized for the characterization of multiple trauma patients within randomized controlled trials (RCTs).<br />Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and clinicaltrials.gov between January 1, 2002, and July 31, 2022. RCTs or RTCs protocols were eligible if they included multiple trauma patients. The terms employed to characterize patient populations were identified, and the corresponding definitions for these terms were extracted. The subsequent impact on the population recruited was then documented to expose clinical heterogeneity.<br />Results: Fifty RCTs were included, and 12 different terms identified. Among these terms, the most frequently used were "multiple trauma" (n = 21, 42%), "severe trauma" (n = 8, 16%), "major trauma" (n = 4, 8%), and trauma with hemorrhagic shock" (n = 4, 8%). Only 62% of RCTs (n = 31) provided a definition for the terms used, resulting a total of 21 different definitions. These definitions primarily relied on the injury severity score (ISS) (n = 15, 30%), displaying an important underlying heterogeneity. The choice of the terms had an impact on the study population, affecting both the ISS and in-hospital mortality. Eleven protocols were included, featuring five different terms, with "severe trauma" being the most frequent, occurring six times (55%).<br />Conclusion: This systematic review uncovers an important heterogeneity both in the terms and in the definitions employed to recruit trauma patients within RCTs. These findings underscore the imperative of promoting the use of a unique and consistent definition.<br /> (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1466-609X
Volume :
27
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Critical care (London, England)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37736733
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04637-w