Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of the clinical safety and performance of a narrow diameter (2.9 mm) bone-level implant: a 1-year prospective single-arm multicenter study.

Authors :
Walter C
Sagheb K
Blatt S
Klein MO
Herrmann J
Kleinheinz J
Al-Nawas B
Source :
International journal of implant dentistry [Int J Implant Dent] 2023 Sep 19; Vol. 9 (1), pp. 32. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Sep 19.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Purpose: Narrow-diameter implants facilitate single-tooth restoration when interdental or inter-implant spaces and bone volume are inadequate for using standard diameter implants. This study reports the short-term data on the clinical safety and performance of a bone-level-tapered two-piece implant with a 2.9 mm diameter in the clinical practice setting. This study was retrospectively registered on March 1st, 2016 (NCT02699866).<br />Methods: Implants were placed in partially healed extraction sockets of the central and lateral incisors in the mandible and lateral incisors in the maxilla for single-tooth replacement. The primary outcome was to assess implant survival at 12 months after placement. Secondary outcomes included implant success, pink esthetic score, marginal bone-level changes, and safety.<br />Results: Twenty four males and 17 females with a mean age of 44.5 (± 18.3 standard deviation) received the implant. Three out of 41 implants were lost yielding a survival rate of 92.7% (95%-CI: 79.0%; 97.6%) at 1 year. One patient reported an ongoing foreign body sensation, pain, and/or dysesthesia at month 12. The average pink esthetic score at 6 months was 11.2 (95%-CI: 10.5; 11.9). The bone level was stable with a mean bone-level change of-0.3 mm (± 0.42 mm standard deviation) at 1 year after implantation. No serious adverse events or adverse device events were reported.<br />Conclusions: The use of a 2.9 mm diameter bone-level-tapered implant is a safe and reliable treatment option for narrow tooth gaps at the indicated locations. Overall performance and good survival rates support their use in cases, where wider implants are unsuitable.<br /> (© 2023. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Implantologie im Zahn‐, Mund‐ und Kieferbereich e.V., Japanese Society of Oral Implantology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2198-4034
Volume :
9
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of implant dentistry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37725234
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00495-x