Back to Search
Start Over
Inter- and intra-observer reliability of thoracic limb circumference measurement methods in sound dogs.
- Source :
-
Frontiers in veterinary science [Front Vet Sci] 2023 Aug 14; Vol. 10, pp. 1172033. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 14 (Print Publication: 2023). - Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Objective: The primary objectives of this study are to (1) compare the inter- and intra-observer reliability of thoracic limb circumference measurement methods in sound dogs, and (2) determine the most reliable thoracic limb positioning and location on the thoracic limb for performing circumferential measurements.<br />Methods: Thoracic limbs of 10 apparently sound dogs (20 limbs) were blindly and independently measured by 3 observers. Triplicate measurements were performed with dogs in lateral recumbency at 50 and 70% brachial (Br) length (length between the greater tubercle and lateral humoral epicondyle) and 25% ABr length (length between the lateral humeral epicondyle and ulnar styloid process), both with the elbow extended and at an approximate weight-bearing (WB) angle. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for data analysis with a p < 0.05 being significant.<br />Results: All measures had significantly good to excellent intra- (ICC 0.836-0.994, p < 0.001) and inter-observer reliability (ICC 0.834-0.996, p < 0.001). Inter-observer reliability was excellent at 25% ABr extended and WB positions, and at 50% Br WB position, with a wider confidence interval at the latter location. Intra-observer reliability was excellent across all observers for 25% ABr extended and WB, and 50% Br WB positions, also with a wider confidence interval at the latter location.<br />Conclusion: Circumferential measurement of the canine thoracic limb was most reliable at 25% ABr length with the elbow either in an extended or WB position.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 Deabold, Harriz, Madeiros, Davies, Shmalberg and Miscioscia.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2297-1769
- Volume :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Frontiers in veterinary science
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 37645672
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1172033