Back to Search Start Over

2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria.

Authors :
Barbhaiya M
Zuily S
Naden R
Hendry A
Manneville F
Amigo MC
Amoura Z
Andrade D
Andreoli L
Artim-Esen B
Atsumi T
Avcin T
Belmont HM
Bertolaccini ML
Branch DW
Carvalheiras G
Casini A
Cervera R
Cohen H
Costedoat-Chalumeau N
Crowther M
de Jesús G
Delluc A
Desai S
Sancho M
Devreese KM
Diz-Kucukkaya R
Duarte-García A
Frances C
Garcia D
Gris JC
Jordan N
Leaf RK
Kello N
Knight JS
Laskin C
Lee AI
Legault K
Levine SR
Levy RA
Limper M
Lockshin MD
Mayer-Pickel K
Musial J
Meroni PL
Orsolini G
Ortel TL
Pengo V
Petri M
Pons-Estel G
Gomez-Puerta JA
Raimboug Q
Roubey R
Sanna G
Seshan SV
Sciascia S
Tektonidou MG
Tincani A
Wahl D
Willis R
Yelnik C
Zuily C
Guillemin F
Costenbader K
Erkan D
Source :
Annals of the rheumatic diseases [Ann Rheum Dis] 2023 Oct; Vol. 82 (10), pp. 1258-1270. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 28.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Objective: To develop new antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria with high specificity for use in observational studies and trials, jointly supported by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR.<br />Methods: This international multidisciplinary initiative included four phases: (1) Phase I, criteria generation by surveys and literature review; (2) Phase II, criteria reduction by modified Delphi and nominal group technique exercises; (3) Phase III, criteria definition, further reduction with the guidance of real-world patient scenarios, and weighting via consensus-based multicriteria decision analysis, and threshold identification; and (4) Phase IV, validation using independent adjudicators' consensus as the gold standard.<br />Results: The 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria include an entry criterion of at least one positive antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) test within 3 years of identification of an aPL-associated clinical criterion, followed by additive weighted criteria (score range 1-7 points each) clustered into six clinical domains (macrovascular venous thromboembolism, macrovascular arterial thrombosis, microvascular, obstetric, cardiac valve, and hematologic) and two laboratory domains (lupus anticoagulant functional coagulation assays, and solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for IgG/IgM anticardiolipin and/or IgG/IgM anti-β <subscript>2</subscript> -glycoprotein I antibodies). Patients accumulating at least three points each from the clinical and laboratory domains are classified as having APS. In the validation cohort, the new APS criteria vs the 2006 revised Sapporo classification criteria had a specificity of 99% vs 86%, and a sensitivity of 84% vs 99%.<br />Conclusion: These new ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria were developed using rigorous methodology with multidisciplinary international input. Hierarchically clustered, weighted, and risk-stratified criteria reflect the current thinking about APS, providing high specificity and a strong foundation for future APS research.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: RAL is an employee of GlaxoSmithKline.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1468-2060
Volume :
82
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of the rheumatic diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37640450
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2023-224609