Analysis of Hemostatic Effect and Safety of Local Spray Treatment With Hemocoagulase Bothrops Atrox for Injection After Resection of Colon Polyps.

Context: Postoperative bleeding after resection of colon polyps (CPs) is an extremely common adverse event with endoscopic treatment. Hemocoagulase Bothrops Atrox (HBA) is a newly discovered hemostatic substance that contains thrombin-like and coagulation kinase-like enzymes. However, research is lacking about its use for the treatment of intestinal polyps.
Objective: The study intended to examine the hemostatic efficacy and safety of a local spray treatment with HBA, derived from HBA for injection, after CP resection, to provide a new hemostatic method, support HBA's use, and provide evidence for clinical decision making.
Design: The research team performed a randomized controlled study.
Setting: The study took place at the Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University in Baoding, Hebei, China.
Participants: Participants were 200 patients with CP who received treatment at the hospital between December 2020 and December 2022.
Intervention: The research team divided participants into two groups with 100 participants each, an intervention group and a control group, using the random number expression method. For hemostasis, the intervention group received a local spray treatment that used HBA for injection, and the control group received metal-clip closure or electrocoagulation.
Outcome Measures: The research team measured: (1) the hemostatic efficacy; (2) clinical outcomes-time to hemostasis, hemostasis rate, rebleeding rate, and incidence of late postoperative bleeding; (3) at baseline and at 24h postintervention, the coagulation function-prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT), and fibrinogen (FIB); (4) at baseline and at 24h postintervention, PLT parameters-platelet count (PLT), procalcitonin (PCT), and mean platelet volume (MPV); (5) economic effects-total number of participants with hemostasis, hospital days, and total hospital costs; and (6) adverse reactions.
Results: The total hemostatic efficacy for the intervention group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P = .027), and the time to hemostasis was significantly shorter (P < .001) and the hemostasis rate, rebleeding rate, and incidence of late postoperative bleeding were all significantly lower than those of the control group, at P = .009, P = .009, and P = .048, respectively. In addition, the intervention group's postoperative PT, TT, APTT, FIB, and MPV were all significantly lower than those of the control group (all P < .05), while its PLT and PCT were significantly higher than those of the control group (both P < .05). The intervention group's total number of participants with hemostasis, participants with hemostasis, hospital days, and total cost were significantly lower than those of the control group (all P < .05), while no significant difference existed between the groups in the incidence of adverse effects (P > .05).
Conclusions: HBA has an excellent hemostatic effect on intestinal polypectomy, with convenient use and high safety. In the future, popularizing the use of HBA in the treatment of intestinal polypectomy can not only effectively guarantee the postoperative safety of patients but also could reduce their economic burden and improve the quality of clinical medical services.