Access Site-Stratified Analysis of the Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Impella-Supported Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.

This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of Impella-assisted patients with cardiogenic shock, stratified by the access site-transaxillary (TX) or trans-subclavian (TS) versus the conventional transfemoral (TF) approach. For this study, we analyzed the cases entered into the Japanese Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device registry between February 2020 and December 2021. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to identify the predictors of the TX/TS approach, with reference to those who received the conventional TF approach. A log-rank test was performed to compare the 30-day mortality between the 2 approaches. A total of 2,564 cases of Impella were included in the study, of which 167 (6.5%) were accessed by way of the TX/TS approach. TX/TS approach cases were younger and had a higher percentage of concomitant use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or an intra-aortic balloon pump. The predictors of the TX/TS approach included a presentation with the acute coronary syndrome (aOR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.63, p <0.001), cardiac arrest (aOR 0.10, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.36, p = 0.003), cardiogenic shock (aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.79, p = 0.002), and inotropic use (aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.49, p = 0.033). The 30-day mortality was comparable between TX/TS and TF approaches (29.3% vs 29.6%, respectively; log-rank, p = 0.64). Our analysis revealed that approximately 6% of the Impella-assisted patients with cardiogenic shock received the TX/TS approach as their first access site. These results suggest that the TX/TS approach may be a viable alternative to the TF approach in certain patients requiring Impella support.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Kohsaka has received an unrestricted research grant from Novartis Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare.
(Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)