Feasibility evaluation of middle-phase 18 F-florbetaben positron emission tomography imaging using centiloid quantification and visual assessment.

Background: ¹⁸ F-florbetaben (FBB) positron emission tomography (PET) scan has been widely used in research and routine clinical practice. Most studies used late-phase (scanning from 90 to 110 min after injection) FBB scans to generate beta-amyloid accumulation data. The feasibility of middle-phase scan is seldom discussed. Using the middle-phase data can shorten the patients' waiting between the injection and scan, and hospital can acquire more flexible schedule of routine scan.
Methods: Paired middle-phase (60-80 min) FBB scans and standard (90-110 min) FBB scans were obtained from 27 subjects (12 neurodegenerative dementia, 8 mild cognitive impairment, 3 normal control, and 4 patients not suffering from neurodegenerative dementia). Standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were calculated and converted to centiloid (CL) scale to investigate the impact on image quantification. CL pipeline validation were performed to build an equation converting the middle-phase data into equivalent standard scans. Cohen's kappa of binary interpretation and brain amyloid plaque load (BAPL) score were also used to evaluate the intrareader agreement of the FBB image from the two protocols.
Results: The middle-phase FBB SUVR showed an excellent correlation, which provided a linear regression equation of SUVR _FBB60-80 = 0.88 × SUVR _FBB90-110 + 0.07, with R ² =0.98. The slope of the equation indicated that there was bias between the middle and standard acquisition. This can be converted into the CL scale using CL = 174.68 × SUVR - 166.39. Cohen's kappa of binary interpretation and BAPL score were 1.0 (P<0.0001).
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the middle-phase FBB protocol is feasible in clinical applications for scans that are at either end of beta-amyloid spectrum, which provides comparable semiquantitative results to standard scan. Patient's waiting time between the injection and scan can be shortened.
Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-23-58/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
(2023 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.)