Back to Search Start Over

Application of a porous graphitic carbon column to carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis of underivatized individual amino acids using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with elemental analyzer/isotope ratio mass spectrometry.

Authors :
Sun Y
Ogawa NO
Ishikawa NF
Blattmann TM
Takano Y
Ohkouchi N
Source :
Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM [Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom] 2023 Sep 15; Vol. 37 (17), pp. e9602.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Rationale: Isolation of underivatized amino acids (AAs) using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is becoming a popular method for carbon (δ <superscript>13</superscript> C) and nitrogen isotope (δ <superscript>15</superscript> N) analyses of AAs because of the high analytical precision and for performing dual-isotope analysis. However, some AAs in natural samples, especially small, hydrophilic AAs, are not suitably separated using reversed-phase columns (e.g., C18) and ion-exchange columns (e.g., Primesep A).<br />Methods: We developed a new method for HPLC using a porous graphitic carbon column for the separation of nine hydrophilic AAs. After purification, δ <superscript>13</superscript> C and δ <superscript>15</superscript> N values of AAs were determined using elemental analyzer/isotope ratio mass spectrometry (EA/IRMS). We demonstrated the application of this method by determining δ <superscript>13</superscript> C and δ <superscript>15</superscript> N values of individual hydrophilic AAs in a biological sample, the muscle of blue mackerel (Scomber australasicus).<br />Results: Chromatographically, the baseline separation of hydrophilic AAs was achieved in both the standard mixture and the biological sample. We confirmed that δ <superscript>13</superscript> C and δ <superscript>15</superscript> N values of AA standards remained unchanged during the whole experimental procedure. The δ <superscript>13</superscript> C values of AAs in mackerel muscle are also in good agreement with the values obtained using another verified method for δ <superscript>13</superscript> C analysis.<br />Conclusions: The good separation performance of hydrophilic AAs and the reliability of δ <superscript>13</superscript> C and δ <superscript>15</superscript> N analyses of individual AAs using the porous graphite column offer a significant advantage over conventional settings. We suggest that, in the future, the HPLC × EA/IRMS method can be used for reliable δ <superscript>13</superscript> C and δ <superscript>15</superscript> N analyses of AAs in natural samples.<br /> (© 2023 The Authors. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-0231
Volume :
37
Issue :
17
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37580505
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9602