Back to Search Start Over

A Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy Technique Using Transperineal Ultrasound: An Initial Experience.

Authors :
Enders JJ
Pinto PA
Xu S
Gomella P
Rothberg MB
Noun J
Blake Z
Daneshvar M
Seifabadi R
Nemirovsky D
Hazen L
Garcia C
Li M
Gurram S
Choyke PL
Merino MJ
Toubaji A
Turkbey B
Varble N
Wood BJ
Source :
Urology [Urology] 2023 Nov; Vol. 181, pp. 76-83. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 10.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Objective: To report an initial experience with a novel, "fully" transperineal (TP) prostate fusion biopsy using an unconstrained ultrasound transducer placed on the perineal skin to guide biopsy needles inserted via a TP approach.<br />Methods: Conventional TP prostate biopsies for detection of prostate cancer have been performed with transrectal ultrasound, requiring specialized hardware, imposing limitations on needle trajectory, and contributing to patient discomfort. Seventy-six patients with known or suspected prostate cancer underwent 78 TP biopsy sessions in an academic center between June 2018 and April 2022 and were included in this study. These patients underwent TP prostate fusion biopsy using a grid or freehand device with transrectal ultrasound as well as TP prostate fusion biopsy using TP ultrasound in the same session. Per-session and per-lesion cancer detection rates were compared for conventional and fully TP biopsies using Fisher exact and McNemar's tests.<br />Results: After a refinement period in 30 patients, 92 MRI-visible prostate lesions were sampled in 46 subsequent patients, along with repeat biopsies in 2 of the 30 patients from the refinement period. Grade group ≥2 cancer was diagnosed in 24/92 lesions (26%) on conventional TP biopsy (17 lesions with grid, 7 with freehand device), and in 25/92 lesions (27%) on fully TP biopsy (P = 1.00), with a 73/92 (79%) rate of agreement for grade group ≥2 cancer between the two methods.<br />Conclusion: Fully TP biopsy is feasible and may detect prostate cancer with detection rates comparable to conventional TP biopsy.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Peter Pinto Institutional CRADA with Philips; royalties from NIH related to Philips licensing agreement; NIH-related patents planned, issued, or pending (U.S. patent nos. 8 447 384 and 10 215830). Peter L. Choyke Receives payment from royalties paid to the U.S. government for patents on MRI US fusion biopsy licensed to Philips Medical. Baris Turkbey CRADAs with NVIDIA and Philips; royalties from NIH; patents planned, issued, or pending in the field of artificial intelligence. Nicole Varble employee of Philips. Bradford J. Wood Principal investigator on cooperative research and development agreement (CRADA) between National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Philips and CRADAs with industry partners unrelated to this work; travel support related to CRADAs; royalties from NIH related to Philips licensing agreement; patents planned, issued, or pending. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.<br /> (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1527-9995
Volume :
181
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37572884
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.06.036