Age estimation by modified Suchey-Brooks method using three-dimensional reconstructed CT images of Chinese Han population.

The method proposed by Suchey-Brooks for adult age estimation based on the surface morphology of the pubic symphysis has been widely accepted. The applicability of the method varies considerably in different populations. The present study established a virtual reference sample and aimed to develop population-specific criteria that can be used for age estimation in different skeletal samples. First, The dry bone specimens from 100 individuals were compared with their corresponding three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction model and showed high inter-method agreement (k = 0.743-0.811), suggesting that the virtual bone model and physical bone specimens have comparable performances in describing the surface morphology of the pubic symphysis. We retrospectively collected clinical computed tomography (CT) data from 895 Chinese patients to create a virtual reference sample of the pubic symphysis. Based on the original Suchey-Brooks method, each of the 895 reference samples was assigned a phase, for each sex and phase, data on the mean age, standard deviation, and 95% age range of the corresponding sample were obtained, which was then used as the "method modified for Chinese" (modified method) and compared to the "SB method". Compared to the SB method, modified method had a lower inaccuracy in dry bones for males over 35 years and females over 45 years, in dry bone CT test sample for males over 55 years and females over 45 years, and in postmortem CT test sample for males over 35 years and females over 55 years. The modified method can improve the accuracy of age estimation for older samples over 40 years. It has shown considerable reliability when applied as a population-specific criterion, but its accuracy is still not sufficient, and caution is needed when using it.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)