Back to Search Start Over

Diverse values of nature for sustainability.

Authors :
Pascual U
Balvanera P
Anderson CB
Chaplin-Kramer R
Christie M
González-Jiménez D
Martin A
Raymond CM
Termansen M
Vatn A
Athayde S
Baptiste B
Barton DN
Jacobs S
Kelemen E
Kumar R
Lazos E
Mwampamba TH
Nakangu B
O'Farrell P
Subramanian SM
van Noordwijk M
Ahn S
Amaruzaman S
Amin AM
Arias-Arévalo P
Arroyo-Robles G
Cantú-Fernández M
Castro AJ
Contreras V
De Vos A
Dendoncker N
Engel S
Eser U
Faith DP
Filyushkina A
Ghazi H
Gómez-Baggethun E
Gould RK
Guibrunet L
Gundimeda H
Hahn T
Harmáčková ZV
Hernández-Blanco M
Horcea-Milcu AI
Huambachano M
Wicher NLH
Aydın Cİ
Islar M
Koessler AK
Kenter JO
Kosmus M
Lee H
Leimona B
Lele S
Lenzi D
Lliso B
Mannetti LM
Merçon J
Monroy-Sais AS
Mukherjee N
Muraca B
Muradian R
Murali R
Nelson SH
Nemogá-Soto GR
Ngouhouo-Poufoun J
Niamir A
Nuesiri E
Nyumba TO
Özkaynak B
Palomo I
Pandit R
Pawłowska-Mainville A
Porter-Bolland L
Quaas M
Rode J
Rozzi R
Sachdeva S
Samakov A
Schaafsma M
Sitas N
Ungar P
Yiu E
Yoshida Y
Zent E
Source :
Nature [Nature] 2023 Aug; Vol. 620 (7975), pp. 813-823. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 09.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Twenty-five years since foundational publications on valuing ecosystem services for human well-being <superscript>1,2</superscript> , addressing the global biodiversity crisis <superscript>3</superscript> still implies confronting barriers to incorporating nature's diverse values into decision-making. These barriers include powerful interests supported by current norms and legal rules such as property rights, which determine whose values and which values of nature are acted on. A better understanding of how and why nature is (under)valued is more urgent than ever <superscript>4</superscript> . Notwithstanding agreements to incorporate nature's values into actions, including the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) <superscript>5</superscript> and the UN Sustainable Development Goals <superscript>6</superscript> , predominant environmental and development policies still prioritize a subset of values, particularly those linked to markets, and ignore other ways people relate to and benefit from nature <superscript>7</superscript> . Arguably, a 'values crisis' underpins the intertwined crises of biodiversity loss and climate change <superscript>8</superscript> , pandemic emergence <superscript>9</superscript> and socio-environmental injustices <superscript>10</superscript> . On the basis of more than 50,000 scientific publications, policy documents and Indigenous and local knowledge sources, the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) assessed knowledge on nature's diverse values and valuation methods to gain insights into their role in policymaking and fuller integration into decisions <superscript>7,11</superscript> . Applying this evidence, combinations of values-centred approaches are proposed to improve valuation and address barriers to uptake, ultimately leveraging transformative changes towards more just (that is, fair treatment of people and nature, including inter- and intragenerational equity) and sustainable futures.<br /> (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1476-4687
Volume :
620
Issue :
7975
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Nature
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37558877
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9